Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
McCormick & Company Inc v McCormick [2000] FCA 1335
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – Trade marks – registration – application for registration of word marks "mccormick's" and "mccormick's instant batter simply add water" covering instant batter mix – marks deceptively similar to opponent's registered trade marks – whether instant batter and goods the subject of opponent's trade marks (including herbs, spices and seasonings) "goods of the same description" within meaning of s 14(1) of Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – whether honest concurrent use of trade marks established for purposes of s 44(3) – whether geographic limitation on registration should be imposed – where initial use honest – where significant sales outside of Queensland before application filed not shown – where real likelihood of confusion – exercise of discretion under s 44(3) would result in registration under honest concurrent use in Queensland but not other states – discussion of applicant's alleged media campaign against opponent and opponent's alleged acquiescence in applicant's use of mark INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – Trade marks – opposition – whether opponent's marks had acquired a reputation for purposes of s 60 – nature of evidence required to show reputation considered – evidence of substantial sales, advertising and promotion sufficient to infer reputation – whether s 60 grounds for opposition subject to honest concurrent use exception – opposition successful EVIDENCE – Expert opinion – whether evidence from Australian and North American chefs about composition, function and effect of batter relevant – evidence admitted – whether applicant qualified under s 79 of Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) to give expert opinion about relationship between relevant goods – applicant only qualified to give opinion about effect of own product WORDS & PHRASES – "reputation" Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) ss 6, 14(1), 44(1), 44(3), 60 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), ss 76, 79, 144 Trade Marks Act 1955 (Cth) McCormick & Company Inc v McCormick (1998) 42 IPR 515 reversed In Re Jellinek's Application (1946) 63 RPC 59 cited In Re John Crowther & Sons (Milnsbridge) Ltd's Application (1948) 65 RPC 369 cited In Re Frank George Whiting's Application (1952) 69 RPC 219 cited Reckitt & Colman (Australia) Ltd v Boden (1945) 70 CLR 84 cited Southern Cross Refrigerating Co v Toowoomba Foundry Pty Ltd (1954) 91 CLR 592 applied In Re J & J Colman Ltd's Application (1929) 46 RPC 126 referred G Wood, Son & Co Ltd v McVitty & Co Pty Ltd (1964) 34 AOJP 2601 referred In Re Chan Li Chai Medical Factory (HK) Ltd's Application (1990) 90 IPR 140 referred Rowntree plc v Rollbits Pty Ltd (1988) 10 IPR 539 cited Dinning v New Balance Athletic Shoe Inc (1992) AIPC 38719 cited Browne v Dunn (1894) 6 R 67 (HL) mentioned NMFM Property Pty Ltd v Citibank Ltd [No 7] (1999) 161 ALR 576 referred O'Brian v Gillespie (1996) 41 NSWLR 549 referred In Re Alex Pirie & Sons Ltd's Application (1932) 49 RPC 195; 49 RPC 210; (1933) 50 RPC 147 applied In Re John Fitton & Co Ltd's Application (1949) 66 RPC 110 cited Stingray Surf Co Pty Ltd v Lister (1997) 37 IPR 306 cited In Re Electrix Ltd's Application [1957] RPC 369 at 379 cited In Re Simac S p A Macchine Alimentari's Application (1987) 10 IPR 81 cited Aromas Pty Ltd v Aroma Coffee & Tea Co Pty Ltd (1997) 40 IPR 75 cited Trepper v Miss Selfridge Ltd (1991) 23 IPR 335 cited In Re Parkington & Co Ltd's Application (1946) 63 RPC 171 referred Baume & Co Ltd v Moore (A H) Ltd [1958] RPC 226 cited Joseph Rodgers & Sons Ltd v W N Rodgers & Co (1924) 41 RPC 277 cited In Re 'Buler' Trade Mark [1975] RPC 275 referred Jean Patou Parfumeur v Crisena Corp Pty Ltd (1990) 20 IPR 660 referred Emdon Investments Pty Ltd v Shell International Petroleum Co Ltd (1988) 12 IPR 525 referred No Name Restaurants Pty Ltd v No Name Restaurants (Cesare) Pty Ltd (1996) 36 IPR 488 referred Bali Trade Mark (No 2) [1978] FSR 193 cited Johnson & Johnson v S C Johnson & Son Inc (1984) 3 IPR 429 referred Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Brook (1994) 30 IPR 525 referred In Re Burcombe & Co Ltd's Application (1948) 65 RPC 179 distinguished Harkianakis v Skalkos (1997) 42 NSWLR 22 cited Clarkson The Mandarin Club Ltd (1998) 90 FCR 354 cited Crescendo Management Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking Corporation (1988) 19 NSWLR 40 cited Equiticorp Finance Ltd (in liq) v Bank of New Zealand (1993) 32 NSWLR 50 cited Electrolux Ltd v Electrix Ltd (1953) 70 RPC 127; 71 RPC 23 referred ConAgra Inc v McCain Foods (Aust) Pty Ltd (1992) 33 FCR 302 applied Hugo Boss AG v Jackson International Trading Co Kurt D Bruhl GmbH & Co KG (1999) 47 IPR 423 applied Isuzu-General Motors Australia Ltd v Jackeroo World Pty Ltd (1999) 47 IPR 198 referred Marks & Spencer plc v Effem Foods Pty Ltd (2000) AIPC ¶91-560 referred Photo Disc Inc v Gibson (1998) 42 IPR 473 referred RS Components Ltd v Holophane Corp (1999) 46 IPR 451 referred Toddler Kindy Gymbaroo Pty Ltd v Gymboree Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 618 referred Nettlefold Advertising Pty Ltd v Nettlefold Signs Pty Ltd (1997) 38 IPR 495 referred Lee v Korean Air Lines Co Ltd (2000) AIPC ¶91-557 distinguished Winglide Pty Ltd v Corporate Express Inc (1999) 46 IPR 627 distinguished Aktion Zahnfreundlich v Suntory Ltd (1998) 42 IPR 593 distinguished Somers v Greenbelt Pacific Pty Ltd (1998) 42 IPR 587 distinguished Clissold v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd (2000) AIPC ¶91-566 distinguished New South Wales Dairy Corporation v Murray Goulburn Co-Operative Company Ltd (1990) 171 CLR 363 considered/distinguished Carnival Cruise Lines Inc v Sitmar Cruises Ltd (1994) 120 ALR 495 referred Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths Ltd (1999) 93 FCR 365 referred Janice Luck, "Distinctiveness, Deceptive and Confusing Marks under the Trade Marks Act 1995" (1996) 7 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 97 McCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED v MARY McCORMICK VG 240 of 1998 KENNY J MELBOURNE 15 SEPTEMBER 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate