Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Maritime Union of Australia v Geraldton Port Authority [2000] FCA 1342 INDUSTRIAL LAW – revision of conditions for provision of stevedoring labour – whether respondent acted to frustrate final orders of court so far as in favour of applicants PROCEDURE – liberty to apply – scope of power reserved – whether authorises variation of orders Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth), s 298U Federal Court Rules, O 37 r 6 Abigroup Limited v Abignano (1992) 39 FCR 74, followed Comcare v Grimes (1994) 50 FCR 60, followed QDSV Holdings Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1995) 59 FCR 301, followed Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v Perry (1988) 53 SASR 538, followed Cristel v Cristel [1951] 2 KB 725, not followed Abbott v Abbott (1930) 47 TLR 207, cited Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Court of Appeal (Hutley, Glass and Mahoney JJA) 31 March 1983, followed Phillips v Walsh (1990) 20 NSWLR 206, followed Haviland v McLeary (1894) 15 LR (NSW) (Eq) 22, cited Poisson & Woods v Robertson & Turvey (1902) 86 LT 302, cited Dowdle v Hillier (1949) 66 WN (NSW) 155, cited Re Porteous [1949] VLR 383; [1950] ALR 89, cited Coffs Harbour Environment Centre Inc v Minister for Planning (1994) 84 LGERA 324, applied Patrick Stevedores v MUA (1998) 195 CLR 1, applied Fylas Pty Ltd v Vynal Pty Ltd [1992] 2 QDR 593, applied Parker Wines Pty Ltd v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd unreported, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Young J 7 December 1995, followed D A Christie Pty Ltd v Baker [1996] 2 VR 582 at 597-9, cited Walton v Gardiner (1993) 177 CLR 378, cited Stephenson v Garnett [1898] 1 QB 677, cited BPTC Ltd (in liq.), unreported, NSWSC, Lib No BC 9504326, cited Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336, followed MUA v Geraldton Port Authority (1999) 93 FCR 34, followed Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298, referred to Ritchie's Supreme Court Procedure (NSW) v1, p 2901-2 MARITIME UNION OF AUSTRALIA AND PETER WINCH-BUIST, PAUL ARTHUR, CLIVE LAURISTEN, STEVEN PENNEY V GERALDTON PORT AUTHORITY AND ERIC CHARLETON AND MURRAY CRIDDLE WAG 98 and 101 of 1998 R D NICHOLSON J 19 SEPTEMBER 2000 PERTH
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate