Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Ali [2000] FCA 1385 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – deportation – review of decision to deport pursuant to power under s 200 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ("the Act") – policy directions under s 499 of the Act – risk posed by respondent to the Australian community – whether Administrative Appeals Tribunal could go behind the facts upon which respondent previously convicted – policy considerations against administrative decisions being based on findings inconsistent with criminal convictions – whether distinction between convictions which enliven power to make deportation orders and those which do not ESTOPPEL – issue estoppel – whether issue estoppel best understood as a rule of evidence – whether Administrative Appeals Tribunal bound by issue estoppel Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 200 Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v SRT (1999) 91 FCR 234, applied General Medical Council v Spackman [1943] AC 627, applied Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Daniele (1981) 61 FLR 354, applied Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Gungor (1982) 63 FLR 441, applied Ridley v Secretary, Department of Social Security (1993) 42 FCR 276, considered Saffron v Commissioner of Taxation (1991) 30 FCR 578, discussed Degerli v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1981) 4 ALN N39, cited Hollington v Hewthorn & Co Ltd [1943] KB 587, distinguished Hunter v Chief Constable of West Midlands Police [1982] AC 529, cited Wiest v Director of Public Prosecutions (1988) 23 FCR 472 (FC), cited Ramsay v Pigram (1968) 118 CLR 271, cited Minh v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1998) 86 FCR 304, cited Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24, cited Drake v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1979) 46 FLR 409, cited Kuswardana v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1981) 54 FLR 334, cited MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS v SHANE ALI N 60 of 2000 BRANSON J SYDNEY 29 SEPTEMBER 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate