Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Shaly v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1418 MIGRATION – remitted from High Court of Australia – application for protection visa – claim of failure to make finding on material question of fact – whether question of fact was material – requirement to provide reasons for rejection of claim – claim of failure to exercise jurisdiction – error of law.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth): s 476
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh [2000] FCA 845 referred to MUHAMMED ZANOOS MOHAMED SHALY v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS V 110 of 2000 GOLDBERG J 10 OCTOBER 2000 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 110 of 2000
ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: MUHAMMED ZANOOS MOHAMED SHALY
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: GOLDBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 10 OCTOBER 2000
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application by the applicant for the relief sought in that part of the application remitted to the Federal Court of Australia by the High Court of Australia is refused. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the proceeding in the Federal Court of Australia including the costs reserved by Hayne J on 23 November 1999. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 110 of 2000
ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: MUHAMMED ZANOOS MOHAMED SHALY
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: GOLDBERG J
DATE: 10 OCTOBER 2000
PLACE: MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate