Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hicks v Aboriginal Legal Service of Western Australia (Inc) [2000] FCA 1448
ABORIGINES – native title – decision by representative body under Native Title Act not to fund native title claim – decision set aside and reconsideration directed – body ceasing to be representative body before reconsideration concluded – fresh application under Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act to compel decision – whether application competent – no useful relief available – want of power in body to comply with any direction. Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) s 202 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 Native Title Amendment Act 1998
Hicks v Aboriginal Legal Service of Western Australia (Inc) (2000) 98 FCR 435 referred to WILFRED HICKS AND OTHERS ON BEHALF OF THE WONG-GOO-TT-OO NATIVE TITLE CLAIMANT GROUP v ABORIGINAL LEGAL SERVICE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA (INC) W105 of 2000 FRENCH J 13 OCTOBER 2000 PERTH
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W105 OF 2000
BETWEEN: WILFRED HICKS AND OTHERS ON BEHALF OF THE WONG-GOO-TT-OO NATIVE TITLE CLAIMANT GROUP
APPLICANT
AND: ABORIGINAL LEGAL SERVICE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA (INC)
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: FRENCH J
DATE OF ORDER: 13 OCTOBER 2000
WHERE MADE: PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application is dismissed. 2. The Applicants are to pay the Respondent's costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY W105 OF 2000
BETWEEN: WILFRED HICKS AND OTHERS ON BEHALF OF THE WONG-GOO-TT-OO NATIVE TITLE CLAIMANT GROUP
APPLICANT
AND: ABORIGINAL LEGAL SERVICE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA (INC)
RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate