Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
PWB Anchor Ltd v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing & Kindred Industries Union (No 2) [2000] FCA 1491 INDUSTRIAL LAW – strike action – bans on loading of trucks – injunction to restrain bans on loading of trucks – bans pursuant to notices of industrial action – lapse of time between issuing notices and bans – whether bans protected action – whether bans had an effect on three days' notice of indefinite strike – ability to take defensive action.
Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth): s 170ML, s 170MO
Davids Distribution Pty Ltd v National Union of Workers (1999) 165 ALR 550 referred to PWB ANCHOR LTD v AUTOMOTIVE, FOOD, METALS, ENGINEERING, PRINTING & KINDRED INDUSTRIES UNION & ANOR (No 2) V 792 of 2000 GOLDBERG J 18 OCTOBER 2000 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 792 of 2000
BETWEEN: PWB ANCHOR LTD
Applicant
AND: AUTOMOTIVE, FOOD, METALS, ENGINEERING, PRINTING AND KINDRED INDUSTRIES UNION
First Respondent
AUSTRALIAN WORKERS' UNION
Second Respondent
JUDGE: GOLDBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 18 OCTOBER 2000
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
UPON the applicant by its counsel undertaking: A. to submit to such order (if any) as the Court may consider to be just for the payment of compensation, to be assessed by the Court or as it may direct, to any person, whether or not a party, adversely affected by the operation of the interlocutory order made hereunder or any continuation, with or without variation, thereof; and B. to pay the compensation referred to in (a) to the person there referred to.
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Pending the trial of the proceeding or further order, the respondents and each of them be restrained whether by their officers, agents or otherwise howsoever from taking, continuing to take or threatening to take any industrial action, or inducing, procuring or advising any employee of the applicant to take, continue to take or threaten to take any industrial action, in the nature of bans upon the loading of trucks or bans on the dispatching of finished or part finished product pursuant to, or in reliance upon, the notices to the applicant dated 11 September 2000 being exhibits MUH 4 and MUH 5 to the affidavit of Michael Ulf Homann sworn 13 October 2000. 2. The respondents use their best endeavours to bring the terms of this order to the notice of those employees of the applicant who are members of the respondents, by 9.00am on 19 October 2000.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate