Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Zhao v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs
[2000] FCA 1523 IMMIGRATION – application for Business (Long Stay), Subclass 457 visa – criteria for visa includes approved business nomination by applicant's employer – business nomination not approved – evidence of further business nomination before the Migration Review Tribunal – whether Tribunal erred in not postponing decision until further nomination determined.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth). Migration Regulations, reg 1.20B, 1.20D, 1.20G, 1.20H; Sch 1, Item 1223A; Sch 2, cl 457.22.
HUA ZHAO v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 814 of 2000 SACKVILLE J SYDNEY 27 OCTOBER 2000
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 814 OF 2000
BETWEEN: HUA ZHAO
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: SACKVILLE J
DATE OF ORDER: 27 OCTOBER 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 814 OF 2000
BETWEEN: HUA ZHAO
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: SACKVILLE J
DATE: 27 OCTOBER 2000
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This is an application to review a decision of the Migration Review Tribunal ("MRT"), given on 30 June 2000. The MRT affirmed a decision of a delegate of the respondent ("the Minister") that the applicant was not entitled to the grant of a Temporary Business Entry (Class UC) visa or any other sub-class of visa in this class. 2 The applicant is a citizen of the People's Republic of China. On 7 August 1998, he applied for a visa to enable him to stay in Australia for a period of two years. The application was made on Form 1066 which was appropriate for an application for a Business (Long-Stay), Subclass 457 visa. The application form indicated that the applicant was a person sponsored by a business outside Australia in order to establish or assist in establishing a business activity in Australia. At the time the application was made the applicant held an Executive (Sub-class 413) visa which was due to expire on 31 August 1998.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate