Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
First Netcom Pty Ltd v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2000] FCA 1542 PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – application for leave to use affidavits filed but not read in the proceedings in proceedings in another court – whether material relevant to other proceedings CORPORATIONS LAW – company under administration – stay of proceedings – whether application for leave to use documents filed with the Court a 'proceeding against' the company under s 440D of the Corporations Law Corporations Law ss 440A(2), 440D
Allstate Life Insurance Co v ANZ Banking Group (1995) 57 FCR 360 referred to Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally (1999) 198 CLR 511 referred to FIRST NETCOM PTY LIMITED v TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED N 543 OF 2000 EMMETT J 20 OCTOBER 2000 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 543 OF 2000
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: FIRST NETCOM PTY LIMITED
APPELLANT
AND: TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 20 OCTOBER 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Telstra Corporation Limited be granted leave to use in proceeding No 3760 of 2000 in the Supreme Court of New South Wales paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of the affidavit of Peter Bruce Raupach sworn 11 September 2000 and paragraphs 2(ii) and (iii) and annexures B and C of the affidavit of Peter Bruce Raupach sworn 13 September 2000, such uses to be limited to reliance on the information contained in those paragraphs for the purposes of: (a) cross-examination; (b) preparation of notice to produce; (c) tendering against First Netcom Pty Limited; and (c) reading as affidavits in that proceeding.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate