Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lardil, Kaiadilt, Yangkaal, Gangalidda Peoples
v State of Queensland & Ors
[2000] FCA 1548 EVIDENCE - Hearsay evidence - hearsay evidence in an expert's report - consideration of use of hearsay evidence as proof of the fact asserted in the hearsay evidence. NATIVE TITLE - Expert on anthropological evidence - consideration of dispensing with the rules of evidence.
Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 59, 60, 136 Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) s 82 Yarmirr v Northern Territory & Ors [No 2] (1998) 82 FCR 533 Cons Daniels v State of Western Australia [2000] FCA 858 Cited Welsh v R (1996) 90 A Crim R 364 Foll Lee v R (1998) 195 CLR 594 Refd Quick v Stoland (1998) 87 FCR 371 Cited Walker v Walker (1937) 57 CLR 630 Refd
LARDIL, KAIADILT, YANGKAAL, GANGALIDDA PEOPLES v STATE OF QUEENSLAND, COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, PASMINCO CENTURY MINE LIMITED, GROUP 2 PASTORAL RESPONDENTS AND QUEENSLAND SEAFOOD INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION QG 207 OF 1997 COOPER J BRISBANE 1 NOVEMBER 2000
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY QG207 OF 1997
BETWEEN: LARDIL, KAIADILT, YANGKAAL, GANGALIDDA PEOPLES
APPLICANT
AND: STATE OF QUEENSLAND
FIRST RESPONDENT
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
SECOND RESPONDENT
PASMINCO CENTURY MINE LIMITED
THIRD RESPONDENT
GROUP 2 PASTORAL RESPONDENTS
EIGHTH, NINTH AND TENTH RESPONDENT
QUEENSLAND SEAFOOD INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION
ELEVENTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: COOPER J
DATE: 1 NOVEMBER 2000
PLACE: BRISBANE
THE COURT RULES THAT: 1. The Court refuses to make an order under s 136 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) or to dispense with the rules of evidence pursuant to s 82 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth). 2. The report of Dr Nicholas Evans filed 26 November 1998 together with the addenda to it will be admitted without limitation as to the operation of s 60 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) to the contents of such material. 3. The oral evidence of Dr Nicholas Evans as to statements made to him by eight named persons in respect of a field trip to locate a relevant site be admitted without limitation as to the operation of s 60 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) to the content of such statements.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate