Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wang v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1599 MIGRATION – protection visa – refugee – law prohibiting religious practice other than at registered religious institutions – whether a law of general application – whether punishment for religious practice at an unregistered institution is prosecution or persecution – whether, for the purposes of the Convention, religion includes its practice in a like-minded community – role of international human rights Conventions in interpretation of the Refugees' Convention – whether fear of persecution based on an intention to practice religion at an unregistered institution in the future can constitute a well-founded fear of persecution. WORDS AND PHRASES - "Religion"
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s476(1) Chokov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 823 – cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Zheng [2000] FCA 50 – not followed Tang v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 985 – not followed Applicant A v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 190 CLR 225 – considered Chen Shi Hai v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 170 ALR 553 Zolfagharkani v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration (1993) 3 F.C 540 - cited Chang v INS 119 F3d 1055 (3d circuit, 1997) – cited Namitabar v Canada (Minister of Employment & Immigration) (1994) 2 F.C. 42 – cited Fathi-Rad v Canada (1994) 77 F.T.R 41 – cited Bastanipour v INS 980 F.2d 1129 (7th circuit, 1992) – cited Okere v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998), 157 ALR 678 – considered Fosu v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration)(1994) 90 FTR 182 – cited Irripugge v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)(2000) 94 A.C.W.S. 3d 733 - cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Mohammed (2000) 98 FCR 405 – applied Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 – cited Mohammed v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 868 – applied Danian v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2000] Imm AR 96 - considered Secretary of State for the Home Department v Ahmed [2000] 1 NLR 1 – considered The Little Company of St Mary (SA) Incorporated v The Commonwealth (1942) 66 CLR 368 – cited Nguyen v Nguyen (1990) 169 CLR 245 – cited WANG v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N490 of 2000 JUDGES: WILCOX, GRAY and MERKEL JJ DATE: 10 NOVEMBER 2000 PLACE: SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate