Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ugochukwu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs
[2000] FCA 1602
MIGRATION – review of decision of Migration Review Tribunal – Tourist (Long Stay) visa – whether visa applicant's expressed intention "only to visit Australia" genuine – to whom and for what purpose visa applicant must express intention "only to visit Australia" –time at which genuineness of intention to be determined – whether visa applicant had present intention to leave Australia at end of proposed visa period – whether evidentiary material before Tribunal permitting it to make finding of particular fact – whether evidentiary material before Tribunal too stale to be relied upon – whether finding by Tribunal as to visa applicant's state of mind at time of decision supported by probative material and logical grounds. WORDS & PHRASES – "intention … only to visit Australia". Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), par 686.221(2)(c) of Sch 2 Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 476(1)(b), 476(1)(c), 476(1)(e), 476(1)(g), 499(1) Policy Direction No. 1 of 1996, cl 8 British Launderers' Research Association v Borough of Hendon Rating Authority [1949] 1 KB 434 discussed Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Eshetu (1999) 197 CLR 611 discussed Buck v Bavone (1976) 135 CLR 110 referred to Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission (2000) 199 CLR 135 referred to BARBARA CHIOMA UGOCHUKWU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 368 of 2000 KATZ J 9 NOVEMBER 2000 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 368 of 2000
BETWEEN: BARBARA CHIOMA UGOCHUKWU
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: KATZ J
DATE OF ORDER: 9 NOVEMBER 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate