Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
McKellar v Container Terminal Management Services Ltd (No 2) [2000] FCA 1608 PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – pleadings – application for summary dismissal of proceeding pursuant to Federal Court Rules, O 20 r 2 – whether further amended statement of claim discloses reasonable cause of action – whether proceeding frivolous or vexatious. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to strike out further amended statement of claim pursuant to Federal Court Rules, O 11 r 16 – whether further amended statement of claim discloses reasonable cause of action – whether fails to plead material facts – whether pleading has a tendency to cause prejudice or embarrassment – whether leave to replead should be granted. TRADE PRACTICES – Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – ss 52, 53B, 75B – whether allegations adequately pleaded – whether adequate material facts pleaded. TORT – negligence – duty of care – economic loss – Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Pty Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 16 - Perre v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 180 – whether adequate material facts pleaded – whether claim misconceived and untenable. Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 52, 53B and 75B Federal Court Rules O 11 r 16, O 20 r 2 Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (No 3) (1998) 195 CLR 1 referred to Batten v CTMS Ltd [1999] FCA 1576 considered Batten v CTMS Ltd [2000] FCA 915 considered McKellar v Container Terminal Management Services Ltd (1999) 165 ALR 409 at 417-421, 461 referred to Maritime Union of Australia v Patrick Stevedores No 1 Pty Ltd (1998) 77 FCR 456 referred to Henjo Investments Pty Ltd v Collins Marrickville Pty Ltd (1988) 79 ALR 83 at 95 referred to Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Company Pty Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 16 considered Perre v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 180 at 193-194, 202, 217, 218, 253, 254, 300-301, 325 considered Pyrenees Shire Council v Day (1998) 192 CLR 330 at 419-420 referred to Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 referred to General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 referred to Fancourt v Mercantile Credits Ltd (1983) 154 CLR 87 at 99 referred to Sibir v Glanville [2000] FCA 1108 referred to Bond Corporation Pty Ltd v Thiess Contractors Pty Ltd (1987) 14 FCR 193 referred to Council for the City of the Gold Coast v Pioneer Concrete (Qld) Ltd (1998) 157 ALR 135 referred to Croker v Philips Electronics Australia Limited [2000] FCA 991 referred to Elliott v Seymour [1999] FCA 976 referred to Elliott v Seymour (No 2) [2000] FCA 694 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate