Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Melhem v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1617 IMMIGRATION – application for protection visa – application on basis of political activities of applicant – plausibility of applicant's claims – whether Refugee Review Tribunal made findings of fact regarding applicant's claims – whether concluding claims were implausible is a finding of fact – whether periods of detention as claimed amounted to persecution. Migration Act 1958 (Cth): ss 476(1)(a), 430(1) Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh (2000) 98 FCR 469 referred to Rajadurai v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 125 referred to Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 referred to Applicant A v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 190 CLR 225 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajalingam (1999) 93 FCR 220 referred to Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 referred to YHYA MELHEM v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS V 277 of 2000 GOLDBERG J 13 NOVEMBER 2000 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 277 of 2000
BETWEEN: YHYA MELHEM
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: GOLDBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 13 NOVEMBER 2000
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V277 of 2000
BETWEEN: YHYA MELHEM
Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate