Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Marsden v HREOC & Coffs Harbour & District Ex-Servicemen & Women's Memorial Club Ltd [2000] FCA 1619
DISCRIMINATION LAW – disability discrimination – applicant refused service of alcohol, removed from club and deprived of membership of club – discrimination alleged on the basis of opioid dependence – whether opioid dependence a "disability" for the purposes of the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) – whether Inquiry Commissioner gave consideration to whether the Club treated the applicant "less favourably" than it would have treated a person who was not opioid dependent in circumstances that were the same or not materially different – lack of evidence before Inquiry Commissioner as to relative treatment of members by the Club – meaning of "less favourable" – criteria of reasonableness and subjective intention not relevant WORDS & PHRASES – "less favourable"
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) ss 4, 5, 10, 27 Human Rights Legislation Amendment Act (No 1) 1999 (Cth) Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW)
Boehringer Ingelheim Pty Limited v Reddrop [1984] 2 NSWLR 13, applied Hains v Leves (1987) 8 NSWLR 442, applied Australian Iron and Steel Pty Ltd v Banovic (1989) 168 CLR 165, cited Waters v Public Transport Corporation (1991) 173 CLR 349, cited Perth City v DL (1994) 88 LGERA 45, referred to WAYNE EDWARD MARSDEN v HUMAN RIGHTS & EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and COFFS HARBOUR & DISTRICT EX-SERVICEMEN & WOMEN'S MEMORIAL CLUB LTD N 1107 of 1999 BRANSON J SYDNEY 15 NOVEMBER 2000
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1107 of 1999
BETWEEN: WAYNE EDWARD MARSDEN
APPLICANT
AND: HUMAN RIGHTS & EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
FIRST RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate