Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tedella v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs
[2000] FCA 1643
SOLOMON KAHSAY TEDELLA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS V 155 OF 2000 NORTH J 11 OCTOBER 2000 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 155 OF 2000
BETWEEN: SOLOMON KAHSAY TEDELLA
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: NORTH J
DATE OF ORDER: 11 OCTOBER 2000
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The decision of the Tribunal made on 18 February 2000 is set aside and the application is referred to the Refugee Review Tribunal for further consideration. 2. Liberty is reserved to the parties in respect of the submissions concerning the position of Ms Abera. 3. The respondent is to pay the applicant's costs of and incidental to those aspects of the application determined by the reasons for decision given on 11 October 2000.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 155 OF 2000
BETWEEN: SOLOMON KAHSAY TEDELLA
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: NORTH J
DATE: 11 OCTOBER 2000
PLACE: MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
introduction 1 This is an application by Solomon Kahsay Tedella, the applicant, for a review of the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal (the Tribunal) made on 18 February 2000 affirming the decision of the delegate of the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, the respondent, not to grant him a protection visa. This application is to be distinguished from the separate claim brought by the applicant's wife, Ms Abera.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate