Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sreika v Cardinal Financial Securities Ltd [2000] FCA 1647
PROCEDURE – representative proceedings – whether a proceeding commenced as an individual proceeding can be converted to a representative proceeding – whether Part IVA of the Federal Court Act of Australia 1976 is a code Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 s 33H Federal Court Rules O 73 r 3 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) Finance Sector Union of Australia v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1999) 89 FCR 417 followed JOHN ANTHONY SREIKA v CARDINAL FINANCIAL SECURITIES LIMITED & ORS N 654 of 2000 TAMBERLIN J SYDNEY 23 NOVEMBER 2000
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 654 OF 2000
BETWEEN: JOHN ANTHONY SREIKA
APPLICANT
AND: CARDINAL FINANCIAL SECURITIES LIMITED
(ACN 058 650 212)
FIRST RESPONDENT
PHILLIP WASS
SECOND RESPONDENT
LYALL WILLIAMS
THIRD RESPONDENT
STEVEN SEREIKA
FOURTH RESPONDENT
W M MOYES
FIFTH RESPONDENT
STAPLETON PARTNERS CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
(ACN 051 887 748)
SIXTH RESPONDENT
NEIL A WILSON
SEVENTH RESPONDENT
COOPERS & LYBRAND (SECURITIES) LTD
(ACN 003 311 617)
EIGHTH RESPONDENT
AUSTRALIAN TEA TREE MANAGEMENT LTD
(ACN 064 159 842)
NINTH RESPONDENT
TEA TREE PLANTATION LIMITED
(ACN 075 869 402)
TENTH RESPONDENT
FARM FINANCE AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED
(ACN 076 073 017)
ELEVENTH RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER: 23 NOVEMBER 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate