Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1704 MIGRATION - application for review - applicant claimed that he was a refugee on the basis he would face persecution if he was returned to India because he is homosexual - alleged failure to apply "the real chance" test. MIGRATION - relevance of state of law in India - Indian Penal Code criminalises homosexual behaviour, namely sodomy or aiding and abetting sodomy, by "draconian provisions" - applicant submitted that it must follow from the state of the law in India that he has a well-founded fear of persecution throughout India for reasons of his homosexuality. MIGRATION - relocation - claim that the Tribunal failed to consider whether the applicant could relocate within India in accordance with the principles explained in Randhawa v Minister for Immigration Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 52 FCR 437. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 36(2) and s 65(1) Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Gui [1999] FCA 1496 distinguished "Applicant LSLS" v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 211 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v "B" [2000] FCA 930 distinguished Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Guan [2000] FCA 1033 distinguished MMM v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1998] 90 FCR 324 followed Randhawa v Minister for Immigration Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 52 FCR 437 considered Chan Yee Kin v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 referred to Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 referred to Singh v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1014 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jang [2000] FCA 1075 followed SATINDER PAL SINGH v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS S 55 OF 2000 MANSFIELD J 27 NOVEMBER 2000 ADELAIDE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate