Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Abbott Laboratories v Corbridge Group Pty Ltd
[2000] FCA 1713
PATENTS– construction of claims WORDS AND PHRASES – "comprising"
ABBOTT LABORATORIES and ABBOTT AUSTRALASIA PTY LIMITED v CORBRIDGE GROUP PTY LIMITED and SELFCARE PTY LIMITED
N 1252 OF 1999
GYLES J
SYDNEY
24 NOVEMBER 2000
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1252 OF 1999
BETWEEN: ABBOTT LABORATORIES
FIRST APPLICANT
ABBOTT AUSTRALASIA PTY LIMITED
(ACN 000 180 389)
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: CORBRIDGE GROUP PTY LIMITED
(ACN 050 105 256) AND: FIRST RESPONDENT
SELFCARE PTY LIMITED
(ACN 076 031 331)
SECOND RESPONDENT
CORBRIDGE GROUP PTY LIMITED
(ACN 050 105 256)
FIRST CROSS CLAIMANT
SELFCARE PTY LIMITED
(ACN 076 031 331)
SECOND CROSS CLAIMANT
ABBOTT LABORATORIES
FIRST CROSS RESPONDENT
ABBOTT AUSTRALASIA PTY LIMITED
(ACN 000 180 389)
SECOND CROSS RESPONDENT
JUDGE: GYLES J
DATE OF ORDER: 24 NOVEMBER 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Application dismissed. 2. Costs of the application reserved. 3. Cross-claims stood over for further argument. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 1252 OF 1999
BETWEEN: ABBOTT LABORATORIES
FIRST APPLICANT
ABBOTT AUSTRALASIA PTY LIMITED
(ACN 000 180 389)
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: CORBRIDGE GROUP PTY LIMITED
(ACN 050 105 256) AND: FIRST RESPONDENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate