Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cook v Repatriation Commission [2000] FCA 1756
VETERANS' AFFAIRS – veterans' entitlements – disability pension – appeal from decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether veteran's osteoarthritis to the knees was war-caused – whether correct Statement of Principles was applied – whether failure to apply correct Statement of Principles constitutes a relevant error of law – whether evidence satisfied Statement of Principles – whether Tribunal correctly applied relevant provisions under Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) – whether Tribunal correctly applied Repatriation Commission v Deledio (1998) 83 FCR 82 – whether Tribunal provided adequate reasons for decision.
Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 43(2B) Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) ss 9, 119, 120 and 120A Repatriation Commission v Deledio (1998) 83 FCR 82 at 97-8 referred to Keeley v Repatriation Commission (1999) 30 AAR 48 referred to Repatriation Commission v Keeley (2000) 98 FCR 108 referred to Harris v Repatriation Commission (2000) 31 AAR 270 referred to Arnott v Repatriation Commission [2000] FCA 1336 referred to Mason v Repatriation Commission [2000] FCA 1409 referred to Harris v Repatriation Commission [2000] FCA 1687 at pars 7, 38 followed Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 at 272 referred to Morales v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1995) 60 FCR 550 at 560-562 referred to
RONALD ERIC COOK v REPATRIATION COMMISSION V 465 of 2000 WEINBERG J 7 DECEMBER 2000 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 465 OF 1999
BETWEEN: RONALD ERIC COOK
APPLICANT
AND: REPATRIATION COMMISSION
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: WEINBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 7 DECEMBER 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate