Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Mazhar v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1759 MIGRATION – review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – refusal to grant protection visa – whether failure to provide adequate standard of interpreting – whether interpretation so incompetent applicant prevented from giving evidence – whether departure from standard of interpretation related to matter of significance – effect of amendment to s 425(1) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth). MIGRATION – effect of s 427(1)(d) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether Tribunal has duty to require investigation or medical examination. MIGRATION – error of law – whether failure to give proper, genuine and realistic consideration – whether failure to receive relevant material into evidence.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth): ss 425(1), 427(1), 476(1)(a), (b), (c) & (e) Perera v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 92 FCR 6 considered De Silva v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 98 FCR 364 referred to Long v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1172 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Mohammed [2000] FCA 1275 referred to Kumar v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1013 referred to Xiao v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1472 referred to Kulwant Singh v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1996] FCA 1013 referred to Gill v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1057 referred to Rahman v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1277 referred to Anthonypillai v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1368 considered Tedella v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1643 referred to Pollocks v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1514 referred to NADEREH MAZHAR v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS V 517 of 2000 GOLDBERG J 6 DECEMBER 2000 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate