Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bhasani v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1773
migration – Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 476 – review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – failure to observe procedures – whether Tribunal failed to give applicant particulars of any information that the Tribunal considered would be the reason, or part of the reason, for affirming the decision under review – two phone calls to the Department which alleged that the application was not made bona fide – error of law – whether the Tribunal failed to consider that the applicant could be persecuted by reason of his membership of a particular social group – applicant a member of a prominent political family in Bangladesh – whether the Tribunal failed to consider the cumulative effect of possible grounds of persecution Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 424A, 476 Naing v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 344, followed Tin v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1109, cited Dowlat Khan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1478, cited Hellman v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 645, cited ABU NASIM PARVES BHASANI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 883 of 2000 BRANSON J SYDNEY 8 DECEMBER 2000
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N883 of 2000
BETWEEN: ABU NASIM PARVES BHASANI
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: BRANSON J
DATE OF ORDER: 8 DECEMBER 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal be affirmed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate