Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Gilroy v Angelov [2000] FCA 1775 HUMAN RIGHTS – Sex discrimination – alleged sexual harassment by one employee of another – claim by first respondent against employer – sexual harassment found proved – issue as to whether employer had knowledge of inappropriate behaviour – discussion about extent of employer's obligation (if liability is to be avoided) where employer is not aware of inappropriate behaviour – assessment of damages. Sex Discrimination Act 1984 ss 14, 28A, 28B, 106. Boyle v Ishan Ozden and Ors (1986) EOC 92-165, discussed. LEONI MICHELLE GILROY v BRANKO ANGELOV and CRAIG BOTTING AND TONI BOTTING trading as C & T BOTTING CLEANING COMPANY No.465 of 2000 WILCOX J SYDNEY 8 DECEMBER 2000
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALESDISTRICT REGISTRY No.465 of 2000
BETWEEN: LEONI MICHELLE GILROY
Applicant
AND: BRANKO ANGELOV
First Respondent
CRAIG BOTTING AND TONI BOTTING trading as C & T BOTTING CLEANING COMPANY
Second Respondent
JUDGE: WILCOX
DATE OF ORDER: 8 DECEMBER 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY (HEARD AT WOLLONGONG)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Judgment be entered in favour of the applicant, Leoni Michelle Gilroy, against the second respondents, Craig Botting and Toni Botting, in the sum of twenty four thousand dollars ($24,000). 2. The said respondents pay to the said applicant her costs of the proceeding. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALESDISTRICT REGISTRY No.465 of 2000
BETWEEN: LEONI MICHELLE GILROY
Applicant
AND: BRANKO ANGELOV
First Respondent
CRAIG BOTTING AND TONI BOTTING trading as C & T BOTTING CLEANING COMPANY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate