Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kordan Pty Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2000] FCA 1807 INCOME TAX – Determinations under s 177F of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) and amended assessments issued thereafter – tender of assessments under s 177 of the Act – validity – conclusiveness – "the Hickman principle". Whether determination and assessments made in bad faith – whether primary judge erred in failing to infer that determinations and subsequent reassessments made in response to request for compensatory adjustments – whether primary judge erred in finding that assessments issued so as to subject taxpayer to penalty under s 226(1) of the Act.
EVIDENCE – rule in Jones v Dunkel – whether primary judge erred in not drawing inference from Commissioner of Taxation's failure to adduce evidence.
Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 175, s 177 The King v Hickman; Ex parte Fox (1945) 70 CLR 598 discussed Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Richard Walter Pty Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 168 cited Sunrise Auto Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1995) 61 FCR 446 referred to Hoare Bros Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 62 FCR 302 referred to Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 72 FCR 175 referred to San Remo Macaroni Company Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation 99 ATC 5138 referred to Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 discussed ARM Constructions Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1986) 10 FCR 197 referred to Stirling Harbour Services Pty Ltd v Bunbury Port Authority [2000] FCA 1381 referred to Duralla Pty Ltd v Plant (1984) 2 FCR 342 discussed Re Coldham; ex parte Brideson [No 2] (1990) 170 CLR 267 referred to CDJ v VAJ (1998) 197 CLR 172 referred to
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Thiyagarajah (2000) 169 ALR 515 referred to Allesch v Maunz (2000) 173 ALR 648 referred to Council of the City of Greater Wollongong v Cowan (1955) 93 CLR 435 cited Bradshaw v McEwans Pty Ltd (unreported, High Court of Australia, 27 April 1951) Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs v State of Western Australia (1996) 67 FCR 40
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate