Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pirapakaran v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1820 MIGRATION – appeal from decision of primary judge dismissing application for review of decision by Refugee Review Tribunal – whether errors of law – whether failure to consider and make findings on evidence – whether Tribunal should have found that Tamils who experienced extortion were a particular social group – whether Tribunal failed to address evidence of threat to appellant's daughter – whether Tribunal failed to address whether appellant would face detention and mistreatment in Colombo Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 430(1)(d), 476(1)(a)
Alphonsus v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 289 distinguished Perampalam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1999) 84 FCR 274 cited Santhikumar v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1777 cited Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Singh (2000) 98 FCR 469 applied Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Guo (1997) 191 CLR 559 at 575 cited INTHUMATHY PIRAPAKARAN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 583 of 2000 TAMBERLIN, RD NICHOLSON AND FINKELSTEIN JJ SYDNEY 15 DECEMBER 2000
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 583 OF 2000
ON APPEAL FROM A JUDGE OF
THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: INTHUMATHY PIRAPAKARAN
APPELLANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION &
MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: TAMBERLIN, RD NICHOLSON and FINKELSTEIN JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 15 DECEMBER 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: The application is dismissed with costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate