Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Limited [2000] FCA 1837
COURTS – practice and procedure – representative proceeding – whether there should be separate trials of the claim and cross-claim COURTS – practice and procedure – pleadings – amendment – claim in negligence for economic loss – whether applicants' dependence upon or vulnerability to conduct of another can be pleaded by respondent as a defence to the applicants' claim of dependence upon and vulnerability to conduct of the respondent
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Pt IVA
Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Ltd (2000) 97 FCR 175 - cited A.M.P. Fire and General Insurance Company Ltd v Dixon [1982] VR 833 - distinguished Philip Morris (Australia) Ltd v Nixon (2000) 170 ALR 487 - applied Perre v Apand (1999) 164 ALR 606; [1999] HCA 36 - considered Alexander v Cambridge Credit Corporation (1987) 9 NSWLR 310 – cited Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 – cited Wickstead v Browne (1993) 10 Leg Rep SL 2 - cited JOHNSON TILES PTY LTD V ESSO AUSTRALIA LIMITED VG 519 OF 1998 AND VG 524 OF 1998 JUDGE: MERKEL J DATE: 13 DECEMBER 2000 PLACE: MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG 519 OF 1998
VG 524 OF 1998
BETWEEN: JOHNSON TILES PTY LTD AND OTHERS
APPLICANTS
ESSO AUSTRALIA LTD AND ANOTHER
RESPONDENTS/CROSS-CLAIMANTS
AND: STATE ELECTRICITY COMMISSION OF VICTORIA AND OTHERS
CROSS RESPONDENTS/CROSS-CLAIMANTS
BHP PETROLEUM (BASS STRAIT) PTY LTD
CROSS-RESPONDENT JUDGE: MERKEL J
DATE OF ORDER: 13 DECEMBER 2000
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Within 7 days the parties file minutes of orders to give effect to these reasons for judgment. 2. The further hearing of directions be adjourned to 2 February 2001. 3. Costs of each party of the respective motions concerning a separate trial of the negligence claims and the proposed amended defence be reserved. 4. Pending the further directions hearing, directions for the trial of the negligence claims be dealt with in a case management conference before Registrar Efthim. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate