Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kalala v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1861 MIGRATION – review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – refusal to grant protection visa – error of law – whether incorrect interpretation of applicable law – whether incorrect application of law to facts – whether decision authorised by the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether Tribunal failed to exercise jurisdiction conferred on it by the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether Tribunal confined itself to determining only whether the applicant was at Tingi Tingi camp and not whether the applicant may have been at another camp – whether Tribunal failed to consider whether events described in a newspaper article had occurred – whether well founded fear of persecution.
Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 referred to Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd v Comptroller‑General of Customs (1997) 72 FCR 467 referred to
MUTSHIMANS KALALA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS V 760 of 2000 GOLDBERG J 18 DECEMBER 2000 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 760 of 2000
BETWEEN: MUTSHIMANS KALALA
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
JUDGE: GOLDBERG J
DATE OF ORDER: 18 DECEMBER 2000
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the application. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 760 of 2000
BETWEEN: MUTSHIMANS KALALA
Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate