Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cohen v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1875 MIGRATION - application for review of decision of Migration Review Tribunal - applicant a citizen of the United States of America - applicant suffers from chronic fatigue syndrome and other conditions - applicant sought advice and treatment from doctors and participated in a research study that considered her illness whilst in Australia - applicant applied for a Medical Treatment (Visitor) (Class UB) (Subclass 685-Medical Treatment) (Long Stay) visa - decision of a delegate of the respondent to refuse the visa upheld by Tribunal - consideration of whether Tribunal erred in its interpretation of 'medical treatment' within the context of the Migration Regulations by interpreting it to mean specialist medical treatment - whether Tribunal erred in finding that the applicant had not been seeking to obtain medical treatment in Australia and that no arrangements had been concluded to carry out such treatment. Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 476(1)(b), 476(1)(e), 476(1)(g), 499 Migration Regulations cl 685.211, 685.212, 685.212(2), 685.213-685.216, 685.221 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 referred to Thiele v The Commonwealth of Australia (1990) 22 FCR 342 distinguished Bresmac Pty Ltd v Starr (1992) 29 NSWLR 318 distinguished Reid v Secretary of State for Scotland [1999] 2 AC 512 distinguished New South Wales Associated Blue-Metal Quarries Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1956) 94 CLR 509 referred to JOANNE THERESA COHEN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS S 65 OF 2000 MANSFIELD J 21 DECEMBER 2000 ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY S 65 OF 2000
BETWEEN: JOANNE THERESA COHEN
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate