Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jacara Pty Ltd v Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd [2000] FCA 1886 EVIDENCE – tendency evidence – application to adduce evidence of representations made to other prospective tenants of respondent's shopping centre – whether evidence "tendency evidence" within s 97 of Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – whether primary judge erred in holding that the evidence lacked "significant probative value" – test for determining whether tendency evidence has "significant probative value". EVIDENCE – "credibility rule" in s 102 of Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – refusal to permit cross-examination on representations allegedly made to other prospective tenants – whether cross-examination relevant for reason other than credibility – whether evidence from cross-examination would have had "substantial probative value" in relation to credibility. WORDS AND PHRASES – "significant probative value" – "substantial probative value".
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 51A, 82. Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), ss 55, 56, 95, 97, 98, 101, 102, 103, 106, 108, 135, Dictionary. D F Lyons Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1991) 28 FCR 597, cited. Australian Coal and Shale Employees' Federation v Commonwealth (1953) 94 CLR 621, cited. Papakosmos v the Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297, cited. Martin v Osborne (1936) 55 CLR 367, cited. Hoch v the Queen (1988) 165 CLR 292, considered. Harriman v the Queen (1989) 167 CLR 590, considered. R v Ball [1911] AC 47, cited. R v A H (1997) 42 NSWLR 702, cited. Turner v Jenolan Investments Pty Ltd (1985) ATPR 40-571, cited. Dayteck Pty Ltd v Glen Centre (unreported, Supreme Court of Victoria, Eames J, 8 May 1995), cited. Pfennig v the Queen (1995) 182 CLR 461, cited. Mood Music Publishing Co Ltd v De Wolfe Ltd [1976] Ch 119, cited. Mister Figgins Pty Ltd v Centrepoint Freeholds Pty Ltd (1981) 36 ALR 23, cited. Gates v City Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd (1982) 68 FLR 74, cited. Aroutsidis v Illawara Nominees Pty Ltd (1990) 50 FCR 500, cited. Sheldon v Sun Alliance Australia Ltd (1989) 53 SASR 97, considered. Grivas v Brooks (1997) 69 SASR 532, cited. Zaknic Pty Ltd v Svelte Corporation Pty Ltd (1995) 61 FCR 171, considered. R v Lockyer (1996) 89 A Crim R, cited. R v Martin [2000] NSWCCA 332, cited. Ogden Industries Pty Ltd v Lucas [1970] AC 113, cited. Brennan v Comcare (1994) 50 FCR 555, cited. Fleming v Hutchinson (1991) 66 ALJR 211, cited. Norbis v Norbis (1986) 161 CLR 513, cited. House v the King (1936) 55 CLR 499, cited. Palmer v the Queen (1998) 193 CLR 1, cited. R v RPS (unreported, NSW Court of Criminal Appeal, 13 August 1997), cited. R v Beattie (1996) 40 NSWLR 155, cited. Department of Justice v Hepburn (1999) 93 FCR 508, cited. Paterson v Paterson (1953) 89 CLR 212, cited. Australian Law Reform Commission, Evidence, Report No 26 (Interim) (1985). Australian Law Reform Commission, Evidence, Report No 38 (1987). Explanatory Memorandum, Evidence Bill 1993 (Cth). Z Cowen and P Carter, "The Admissibility of Evidence of Similar Facts: A Re-Examination", in Essays on the Law of Evidence (1956). S Odgers, Uniform Evidence Law, (4th ed, 2000). J D Heydon, Cross on Evidence (6th Aust ed, 2000). JACARA PTY LTD & ORS v PERPETUAL TRUSTEES WA LTD V 367 of 2000 WHITLAM, SACKVILLE & MANSFIELD JJ SYDNEY (HEARD IN MELBOURNE) 21 DECEMBER 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate