Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Telstra Corporation Ltd v
Hurstville City Council [2000] FCA 1887
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - local government charges and rates imposed on broadband cables owned by telecommunication carriers - validity of enabling State legislation - whether charges and rates are duties of excise - whether the imposts are "taxes" - whether they are a levy on "goods" - Commonwealth statutory provision that law of a State has no effect "to the extent to which the law discriminates or would have the effect of discriminating" against telecommunication carriers - whether this provision is effective to exclude State laws authorising imposition of rates and charges - validity of provision - role of explanatory memorandum for Bill - meaning of "discriminates" - whether the State laws discriminate - whether Commonwealth provision effects an acquisition of property other than on just terms. TELECOMMUNICATIONS - Carriers' cables installed pursuant to 1991 Telecommunications Act - Extent of immunity to State law provided by transitional provisions in 1997 Act - Whether State laws authorising imposition of rates and charges are laws relating to the occupancy or use of a facility whose construction was authorised under the 1991 Act. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Jurisdiction of Federal Court to determine State law administrative issues. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW - Decisions to make charges and declare rates - whether decisions invalidated by extraneous purposes. Mutual Pools & Staff Pty Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1992) 173 CLR 450 and Adams v Rau (1931) 46 CLR 572 applied. Hematite Petroleum Pty Limited v Victoria (1983) 151 CLR 599 and Capital Duplicators Pty Limited v Australian Capital Territory [No.2] (1993) 178 CLR 561 distinguished. ASX Operations Pty Ltd v Pont Data Australia Pty Ltd (1990) 27 FCR 460 referred to. CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd (1997) 187 CLR 384 and Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 considered. Australian Coastal Shipping Commission v O'Reilly (1962) 107 CLR 46 and Botany Municipal Council v Federal Airports Authority (1992) 175 CLR 453 distinguished. Western Australia v The Commonwealth (1995) 183 CLR 373, and Mabo v Queensland [No.1] (1988) 166 CLR 186 discussed. Warringah Shire Council v Pittwater Provisional Council (1992) 26 NSWLR 491 referred to. Constitution - ss51(v) and (xxxi), 90, 109 Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) s591, Schedule 3 cll. 44, 60 Local Government Act 1989 (Vic) Part 8 Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) s611 Telecommunications Act 1991 (Cth) s116 Telecommunications (Exempt Activities) Regulations 1991- regs 5, 6 Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s15AB Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) ss16, 19, 20, 58, 71 - 2 -
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate