Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dovuro Pty Ltd v Wilkins [2000] FCA 1902
NEGLIGENCE – duty of care – economic loss – absence of physical injury – risk of physical injury – cost of avoiding or minimising risk – standard of care – forseeability – existence of statutory scheme regulating conduct – compliance with statutory scheme – whether liability can be greater than arising under contract
CONTRACT – construction and interpretation – "undesirable species" – trade meaning – incorporated by conduct – custom or usage – how established – exclusion clause – causation
SALE OF GOODS – implied terms – whether purchaser relied on seller's skill and judgment – whether goods of merchantable conduct
PRACTICE & PROCEDURE – appeal – point not argued at trial Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 4, 24 Quarantine Act 1908 (Cth) Sale of Goods Act 1908 (NZ) s 16 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Perre v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 180, discussed Ward v McMaster [1988] IR 337, cited Dynasty Pty Ltd v Coombs (1995) 59 FCR 122, cited White v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 232, cited Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Industrial Relations Commission (2000) 74 ALJR 1348, cited Multicon Engineering Pty Ltd v Federal Airports Corporation (1997) 47 NSWLR 631, applied Winnipeg Condominium Corporation No 36 v Bird Construction Co (1995) 121 DLR (4th) 193, referred to Leigh and Sillivan Ltd v Aliakmon Shipping Co Ltd [1985] QB 350, cited DTR Nominees Pty Ltd v Mona Homes Pty Ltd (1978) 138 CLR 423, distinguished Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982)149 CLR 337, distinguished FAI Traders Insurance Co Ltd v Savoy Plaza Pty Ltd [1993] 2 VR 343, cited Henry Kendall & Sons v William Lillico & Sons Ltd [1969] 2 AC 31, cited Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562, discussed Winterbottom v Wright (1842) 152 ER 402, cited Langridge v Levy (1837) 150 ER 863, cited Haseldine v C A Daw & Son Ltd [1941] 2 KB 343, cited Stennett v Hancock & Peters [1939] 2 All ER 578, cited Maindonald v Marlborough Aero Club & New Zealand Airways Ltd [1935] NZLR 371, cited Howard v Furness Houlder Argentine Lines Ltd [1936] 2 All ER 781, cited Malfroot v Noxal Ltd (1935) 51 TLR 551, cited Watson v Buckley, Osborne, Garnett & Co Ltd [1940] 1 All ER 174, cited Pack v County of Warner (1964) 44 DLR (2d) 215, cited Fraser Henleins Pty Ltd v Cody (1944) 70 CLR 100, cited Harris v Macquarie Distributors Pty Ltd [1967] VR 257, cited Bourhill v Young [1943] AC 92, cited Anns v Merton London Borough Council [1978] AC 728, referred to South Pacific Manufacturing Co Ltd v New Zealand Security Consultants & Investigations Ltd [1992] 2 NZLR 282, cited Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605, cited Reeman v Department of Transport [1997] 2 Lloyds Rep 648, cited Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman (1985) 157 CLR 424, cited Pyrenees Shire Council v Day (1998) 192 CLR 330, cited Romeo v Conservation Commission of the Northern Territory (1998) 192 CLR 431, cited Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan [2000] FCA 1099, referred to Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40, applied United States v Carroll Towing Co 159 F2d 169 (1947), cited Thompson v Johnson & Johnson Pty Ltd [1991] 2 VR 449, considered Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co Ltd [1921] 3 KB 560, referred to Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co Ltd [1961] AC 388, referred to Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963] AC 837, referred to Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v The Miller Steamship Co Pty Ltd [1967] AC 617 (The Wagon Mound (No 2), referred to Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963] AC 837, referred to Mount Isa Mines Ltd v Pusey (1970) 125 CLR 383, referred to Rae v Broken Hill Pty Co Ltd (1957) 97 CLR 419, referred to Hawkins v Coulsdon & Purley Urban District Council [1954] 1 QB 319, referred to Marshall v Lindsey County Council [1935] 1 KB 516, referred to Rogers v Whitaker (1992) 175 CLR 479, cited Austral Pacific Group Ltd (in liquidation) v Airservices Australia [2000] HCA 39, cited Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418, referred to O'Brien v Komesaroff (1982) 150 CLR 310, cited Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1, applied University of Wollongong v Metwally (No. 2) (1985) 59 ALJR 481, applied Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 62 ALJR 209, referred to Banque Commerciale SA, en liquidation v Akhil Holdings Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 279, referred to Ultramares Corp v Touche 174 NE 441, referred to Football Club de Metz v Winoth, "Colmar", 20 April 1955, D, 1956, 723, cited Cattle v Stockton Waterworks Co (1875) LR 10 QB 453, cited Simpson & Co v Thompson (1877) 3 AppCas 279, cited Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd [1964] AC 465, cited Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd v The Dredge "Willemstad" (1976) 136 CLR 529, cited Hill v van Erp (1997) 188 CLR 159, cited Bryan v Maloney (1995) 182 CLR 609, applied Weller & Co v Foot & Mouth Disease Research Institute [1966] 1 QB 569, referred to S C M (United Kingdom) Ltd v W J Whittal & Son Ltd [1971] 1 QB 337, referred to D & F Estates Ltd v Church Commissioners for England [1989] AC 177, cited Murphy v Brentwood District Council [1991] 1 AC 398, cited Rivtow Marine Ltd v Washington Iron Works (1973) 40 DLR (3d) 530, discussed Attorney-General for Ontario v Fatehi (1981) 127 DLR (3d) 603, followed Canadian National Railway Co v Norsk Pacific Steamship Co Ltd (1992) 91 DLR (4th) 289, referred to Nelson v Dahl (1879) 12 ChD 568, applied Majeau Carrying Co Pty Ltd v Coastal Rutile Ltd (1973) 129 CLR 48, applied Appleby v Pursell [1973] 2 NSWLR 879, cited Homestake Australia Ltd v Metana Minerals NL (1991) 11 WAR 435, cited Lord Forres v Scottish Flax Co Ltd [1943] 2 All ER 366, applied Strand Music Hall Co Ltd (1865) 35 Beav 153, referred to SA Maritime et Commerciale of Geneva v Anglo Iranian Oil Co Ltd [1954] 1 WLR 492, cited Tea Trade Properties Ltd v CIN Properties Ltd [1990] 1 EGLR 155, cited Smith Hogg & Co Ltd v Black Sea & Baltic General Insurance Co Ltd [1940] AC 997, referred to Leyland Shipping Co Ltd v Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society Ltd [1918] AC 350, cited Monarch Steamship Co Ltd v Karlshamns Oljefabriker [1949] AC 196, cited March v E & MH Stramare Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506, cited Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 531, followed Fangrove Pty Ltd v Tod Group Holdings Pty Ltd [1999] 2 QdR 236, cited Woollahra Corporation v Sved (1996) 40 NSWLR 101, cited Zumpano v Montagnese [1997] 2 VR 525, cited Bow Valley Husky (Bermuda) Ltd v Saint John Shipbuilding Ltd [1997] 3 SCR 1210, considered Seely v White Motor Co 403 P 2nd 145 [1965], cited Duffin v Idaho Crop Improvement Association 895 P 2nd 1195 (Idaho 1995), cited Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc v Talley 493 SW 2nd 602 (1973), cited Miller v United States Steel Corporation 902 F 2nd 573 (1990), cited State of Louisana ex rel Guste v M/V Testbank 752 F 2nd 1019 (1985), cited East River Steamship Corporation v Transamerica Delaval Inc (1986) 476 US 858, cited State Rail Authority v Earthline Pty Ltd (in liq) (1999) 73 ALJR 306, followed Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd (1994) 179 CLR 520, cited Unity Insurance Brokers Pty Ltd v Pezzano (1998) 192 CLR 603, cited Fleming, The Law of Torts, 9th ed, p 238 Linden, Canadian Tort Law, 5th ed, pp 380-398 Feldthusen B, Pure Economic Loss in the High Court of Australia: Reinventing the Square Wheel? (2000) 8 (1) Tort Law Review 33 American Law Institute, Restatement of the Law, Torts 2nd Ch 14 Prosser & Keeton on The Law of Torts, 5th ed, (1984) Mason A, The Recovery & Calculation of Economic Loss at 22-24 in Mulleny NJ (ed), Torts in the Nineties (1997)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate