Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Caterpillar Inc v John Deere Limited (No 2) [2000] FCA 1903
EVIDENCE – depositions taken in United States proceedings – whether admissible pursuant to s 63 or s 64 of Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) – whether person is available to give evidence – whether all reasonable steps taken to secure attendance – letter inviting person to come to be cross-examined – no tender of expenses – no response to letter – no attempt to make personal contact – no attempt to invoke Foreign Evidence Act 1974 – whether calling person would cause undue expense – relevant factors WORDS AND PHRASES – "all reasonable steps" "undue expense" Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 63, 64, Dictionary Pt 2, cl 4, cl 6 Foreign Evidence Act 1974 (Cth) s 7 Re Sherlock (1991) 102 ALR 156 at 158-9 mentioned R v Walker (1993) 61 SASR 260 at 263 and 266 followed Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Rural Press Ltd (1999) 169 ALR 201 at pars 15-16 followed CATERPILLAR INC V JOHN DEERE LIMITED (NO 2) NO VG 739 OF 1997 HEEREY J 21 DECEMBER 2000 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY VG 739 OF 1997
BETWEEN: CATERPILLAR INC
FIRST APPLICANT
JOHN DEERE LIMITED (ACN 008 671 725) & ORS RESPONDENTS
AND: JOHN DEERE LIMITED (ACN 008 671 725) & ORS
CROSS-CLAIMANTS
CATERPILLAR INC
CROSS-RESPONDENT
JUDGE: HEEREY J
DATE OF ORDER: 21 DECEMBER 2000
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Rule that the evidence sought to be adduced pursuant to the respondents' notice dated 29 September 2000 is not admissible under s 63 or s 64 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth). 2. The respondents pay the applicant's costs in relation to the notice and the hearing on 12 December 2000. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate