Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Woen v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1912 CITIZENSHIP & MIGRATION – protection visa – application for order of review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal affirming decision of delegate of Minister refusing grant – no question of principle Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 476 Chan Yee Kin v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 referred to Ram v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1995) 57 FCR 565 referred to Thiyagarajah v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 73 FCR 176 referred to ASTER SETIAWATI WOEN v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 678 OF 2000 EMMETT J 14 DECEMBER 2000 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 678 OF 2000
BETWEEN: ASTER SETIAWATI WOEN
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 14 DECEMBER 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 678 OF 2000
BETWEEN: ASTER SETIAWATI WOEN
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: EMMETT J
DATE: 14 DECEMBER 2000
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 The applicant is a citizen of Indonesia. She arrived in Australia on 3 October 1998. On 3 November 1998 she lodged an application for protection visa (class AZ) with the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs. On 19 August 1999 a delegate of the respondent, the Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs ("the Minister") refused to grant a protection visa. On 12 September 1999 the applicant applied to the Refugee Review Tribunal ("the Tribunal") for review of that decision. On 15 May 2000 the Tribunal affirmed the decision not to grant a protection visa. The applicant now seeks an order of review by this Court in respect of the decision of the Tribunal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate