Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pioneer Electronics Australia Pty Ltd v Lee [2000] FCA 1926
COPYRIGHT – Importation and sale of "Pioneer" Digital Video Disk (DVD) players ‑ Players programmed to receive DVDs from Japan region and set to operate at 100 volts ‑ DVDs, packaging and instruction manual incorporating "Pioneer" trade marks ‑ Whether importation constituted breach of ss 37 and 38 of Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ‑ DVD players not yet released in Australia by copyright owner ‑ Whether ss 37 and 38 deal only with parallel importation ‑ Whether licence to import ‑ Whether importer had actual or constructive notice that importation and sale of players would constitute infringement of copyright if players had been manufactured by it in Australia ‑ Appropriate test to determine personal liability of director for act of corporation. TRADE PRACTICES ‑ 100 volt Pioneer DVD players sold with transformer made by another company to enable operation at 240 volts ‑ Whether player and transformer safe for use ‑ Whether a representation that DVD and transformer together were suitable and safe for use ‑ Whether representation that applicant had sponsorship or approval of Pioneer ‑ Whether proof of damage necessary to obtain relief ‑ Passing off ‑ Appropriate test to determine personal liability of director for act of corporation. Copyright Act 1968 ss 36, 37, 103, 119 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 52 and 53(d) R A & A Bailey & Co v Boccaccio Pty Ltd (1986) 6 IPR 279 discussed Roland Corporation v Lorenzo & Sons Pty Ltd (1991) 105 ALR 623 cited Avel Pty Ltd v Multicoin Amusements Pty Ltd (1990) 171 CLR 88 applied Lorenzo & Sons Pty Ltd v Roland Corporation (1992) 23 IPR 376 cited Interstate Parcel Express Co Pty Ltd v Time‑Life International (Nederlands) BV (1977) 138 CLR 534 cited RCA Corporation v Custom Cleared Sales Pty Ltd (1978) 19 ALR 123 applied Star Micronics Pty Ltd v Five Star Computers Pty Ltd (1990) 18 IPR 225 cited Apple Computer Inc v Computer Edge Pty Ltd (1984) 53 ALR 225 cited Raben Footwear Pty Ltd v Polygram Records Inc (1997) 37 IPR 417 applied Puxu Pty Ltd v Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd (1979) ATPR 40‑135 applied World Series Cricket Pty Ltd v Parish (1977) ATPR 40,040 applied Wardley Australia Ltd v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 cited A G Spalding & Bros v A W Gamage Ltd (1915) 84 LJ Ch 449 cited Baume & Co Ltd v A H Moore Ltd [1958] Ch 907 cited Millington v Fox (1838) 3 My & Cr 338 cited Warnink v J Townend & Sons (Hull) Ltd [1979] AC 731 cited Conagra Inc v McCain Foods (Aust) Pty Ltd (1992) 33 FCR 302 cited H P Bulmer Ltd and Showerings Ltd v J Bollinger SA [1978] RPC 79 cited Performing Right Society Ltd v Ciryl Theatrical Syndicate Ltd [1924] 1 KB 1 followed Kalamazoo (Aust) Pty Ltd v Compact Business Systems Pty Ltd (1985) 84 FLR 101 followed Martin Engineering Co v Nicaro Holdings Pty Ltd (1991) 100 ALR 358 followed Microsoft Corp v Auschina Polaris Pty Ltd (1996) 142 ALR 111 followed Lott v JWB & Friends Pty Ltd [2000] SASC 3 followed Henley Arch Pty Ltd v Clarendon Homes (Aust) Pty Ltd (1998) 41 IPR 443 followed Mentmore Manufacturing Co Ltd v National Merchandising Manufacturing Co Inc (1978) 89 DLR (3d) 195 considered White Horse Distillers Ltd v Gregson Associates Ltd [1984] RPC 61 cited King v Milpurrurru (1996) 136 ALR 327 cited Trevor Ivory Ltd v Anderson [1992] 2 NZLR 517 considered Said v Butt [1920] 3 KB 497 cited O'Brien v Dawson (1942) 66 CLR 18 cited Rutherford v Poole [1953] VLR 130 cited Root Quality Pty Ltd v Root Control Technologies Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 980 cited PIONEER ELECTRONICS AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED and PIONEER KABUSHIKI KAISHA v BENJAMIN LEE and ALRICARBEN PTY LIMITED VG 723 OF 1997 SUNDBERG J 22 DECEMBER 2000 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate