Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Low v Australian Taxation Office [2000] FCA 1934
LAN LOW v AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE N1211 of 2000
MADGWICK J 7 DECEMBER 2000 SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1211 of 2000
BETWEEN: LAN LOW
APPLICANT
AND: AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MADGWICK J
DATE OF ORDER: 7 DECEMBER 2000
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The applicant's Notice of Motion be dismissed.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1211 of 2000
BETWEEN: LAN LOW
APPLICANT
AND: AUSTRALIAN TAXATION OFFICE
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MADGWICK J
DATE: 7 DECEMBER 2000
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT (revised from transcript) HIS HONOUR: 1 The applicant has an appeal pending in this Court against a judgment of Driver FM, by which judgment his Honour declined to grant an extension of time for the applicant to bring an application to institute proceedings alleging unlawful discrimination by her former employer, the respondent, contrary to the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth), the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) and the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth). 2 The applicant has moved the Court for an order, in effect, that she be permitted to subpoena "all documents to be made available to the applicant for the purpose of clearing defamatory statements/files created by the ATO, Dept of Social Security and/or any other government offices". 3 It appears that the applicant's history with the Australian Tax Office ("ATO") was lengthy and, to put the matter neutrally and without laying blame anywhere, marked by some conflict between her and various officers of that institution. Driver FM took the view that there was nothing before him to suggest an arguable case of discrimination under any of the
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate