Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Chapman v Saunders [2001] FCA 4
CONTEMPT OF COURT – failure to comply with subpoena for production – questions of relevance and necessity irrelevant considerations.
Attorney-General v Mulholland [1963] 2 QB 477 James v Cowan; In re Botten (1929) 42 CLR 305 Hancock v Lynch [1988] VR 173
THOMAS LINCOLN CHAPMAN, WENDY JENNIFER CHAPMAN AND BINALONG PTY LTD (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (IN LIQUIDATION) v SANDRA DOROTHY SAUNDERS
NO S 113 OF 2000
JUDGES: BEAUMONT & HEEREY JJ
DATE: 3 JANUARY 2001
PLACE: SYDNEY (HEARD IN ADELAIDE)
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY NO S 113 OF 2000
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: THOMAS LINCOLN CHAPMAN
FIRST APPELLANT
WENDY JENNIFER CHAPMAN
SECOND APPELLANT
BINALONG PTY LTD (RECEIVERS AND MANAGERS APPOINTED) (IN LIQUIDATION)
THIRD APPELLANT
AND: SANDRA DOROTHY SAUNDERS
RESPONDENT
JUDGES: BEAUMONT & HEEREY JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 3 JANUARY 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY (HEARD IN ADELAIDE)
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. Appeal allowed, with costs. 2. Set aside the orders made by O'Loughlin J at first instance; in lieu thereof order that the matter be remitted to O'Loughlin J for further hearing and determination in relation to the relief sought by the appellants, in accordance with the judgment of this Full Court. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY NO S 113 OF 2000
ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: THOMAS LINCOLN CHAPMAN
FIRST APPELLANT
WENDY JENNIFER CHAPMAN
SECOND APPELLANT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate