Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Choi v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 6
MIGRATION – application for review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal affirming decision of delegate of respondent refusing application for protection visa – whether, within the context of ss476(1)(g) and 476(4)(b) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), the Refugee Review Tribunal based its decision to refuse to grant the protection visa "on the existence of a particular fact, and that fact did not exist" – whether the Refugee Review Tribunal based its decision on a number of separate and independent particular facts constituting "parallel links" in a "chain of reasoning"
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss476(1)(g), 476(4)(b)
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss5(1)(h), 5(3)(b) Indatissa v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1119 followed
Curragh Queensland Mining Ltd v Daniel (1992) 34 FCR 212 applied
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Li Yue [2000] FCA 856 applied
Merabishvili v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1879 followed
Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam [2000] FCA 1023 applied
PUN CHOI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS V 232 OF 2000 MARSHALL J 19 JANUARY 2001 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V232 OF 2000
BETWEEN: PUN CHOI
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MARSHALL J
DATE OF ORDER: 19 JANUARY 2001
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicant pay the respondent's costs, including reserved costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate