Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Boral Ltd [2001] FCA 30 TRADE PRACTICES – market – product market – how ascertained – market power – ability to exclude competition – barriers to entry – structural barriers – dynamic barriers – predatory pricing as barrier – excess capacity as barrier – misuse of market power – predatory pricing WORDS AND PHRASES – "power in a market"
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 4E, 46 Sherman Act 1890 (US) (15 USC §§ 1 to 7) Clayton Act 1914 (US) (15 USC §§ 12 to 27) Robinson-Patman Act 1936 (US) Treaty of Rome Art 86 A A Poultry Farms, Inc v Rose Acre Farms, Inc 881 F2d 1396 (7th Cir 1989) cited Abalos v Australian Postal Commission (1990) 171 CLR 167 applied AKZO Chemie BV v Commission of the European Communities [1994] ECR I-3359 discussed American Key Corporation v Cole National Corporation 762 F 2d 1569 (11th Cir 1985) cited Arnotts Limited v Trade Practices Commission (1990) 24 FCR 313 considered ASX Operations Pty Ltd v Pont Data Australia Pty Ltd (No. 1) (1990) 27 FCR 460 considered Betaseed, Inc v U & I Incorporated 681 F2d 1203 (9th Cir 1982) cited Bhan v NME Hospitals, Inc 669 FSupp 998 (1987) cited Brooke Group, Ltd v Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp 509 US 209 (1993) not followed Brown Shoe Co, Inc v United States 370 US 294 at 325 fn 42 (1961) cited Cargill, Inc v Monfort of Colorado, Inc 479 US 104 (1986) not followed Continental Can Co Inc, Re [1972] CMLR D11 considered Davids Holdings Pty Ltd v Attorney-General (Cth) (1994) 49 FCR 211 cons Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472 applied Dowling v Dalgety Australia Limited (1992) 34 FCR 109 Eastern Express Pty Limited v General Newspapers Pty Limited (1991) 30 FCR 385 referred to General Foods Corporation, In the Matter of 103 FTC 204 (1984) cons General Newspapers Pty Limited v Eastern Express Pty Limited (1992) 35 FCR 43 referred to Hoffman-La Roche v Commission [1979] 1 ECR 461 considered Irish Sugar plc v Commission of the European Communities [1999] ECR II-2969 discussed Jack Winter, Inc v Koratron Company, Inc 375 FSupp 1 (1974) cited Jones v Hyde (1989) 63 ALJR 349; 85 ALR 23 applied Matsushita Electric Industrial Co, Ltd v Zenith Radio Corp 475 US 574 (1986) cited Melway Publishing Pty Ltd v Robert Hicks Pty Ltd (1999) 90 FCR 128 cited National Dairy Products Corporation v United States 350 F2d 321 (8th Cir 1965) cited Pont Data Australia Pty Ltd v ASX Operations Pty Ltd (1990) 21 FCR 385 considered Porto Rican American Tobacco Co of Porto Rico v American Tobacco Co 30 F2d 234 (2d Cir 1929) cited Queensland Co-operative Milling Association Ltd, Re (1976) 25 FLR 169 considered Queensland Wire Industries Proprietary Limited v Broken Hill Proprietary Company Limited (1988-1989) 167 CLR 177 applied Richter Concrete Corporation v Hilltop Concrete Association 691 F 2d 818 (1982) considered Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v United States 221 US 1 (1910) cited State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Earthline Constructions Pty Ltd (in liq) (1999) 73 ALJR 306; 160 ALR 588 applied Story Parchment Co v Paterson Parchment Paper Co 282 US 555 (1931) cited Trade Practices Commission v CSBP & Farmers Ltd (1980-1981) 53 FLR 135 referred to Trade Practices Commission v Pioneer Concrete (Qld) Pty Ltd (1994) 50 FCR 160 considered TV Signal Company of Aberdeen v American Telephone and Telegraph Company 462 F2d 1256 (8th Cir 1972) cited United States v Aluminium Co of America 184 F 2d 416 (1945) considered United States v Columbia Steel Co 334 US 495 at 510-511 (1947) cited United States v E I du Pont de Nemours & Co 351 US 377 (1956) applied United States v Grinnell Corp 384 US 563 (1965) cited US Anchor Manufacturing, Inc v Rule Industries, Inc 7 F3d 986 (1986) cited Utah Pie Co v Continental Bakery Co 386 US 685 (1967) discussed Victorian Egg Marketing Board v Parkwood Eggs Pty Ltd (1977-1978) 33 FLR 294 referred to W Adams and D Brock "Predation, 'Rationality', and Judicial Somnambulance" 64 University of Cincinnati Law Review 811 (1996) P E Areeda, J L Solow & H Hovenkamp Antitrust Law (1995) vol IIA p 85 P Areeda and D Turner "Predatory Pricing and Related Practices Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act" 88 Harvard Law Review 697 (1975) J S Bain Barriers to New Competition (1956) J B Baker "Predatory Pricing After Brooke Group: An Economic Perspective" 62 Antitrust Law Journal 585 (1994) S Beck "Intent as an Element of Predatory Pricing under Section 2 of the Sherman Act" 76 Cornell Law Review 1242 (1991) Bork The Antitrust Paradox (1978) J F Brodley & G A Hay, "Predatory Pricing: Competing Economic Theories and the Evolution of Legal Standards" 66 Cornell Law Review 738 (1981) B O Bruckman (ed) "Predatory Pricing Law – a Circuit-by-Circuit Survey" (1995) published by the Antitrust Law Section of the American Bar Association Easterbrook "The Limits of Antitrust" 63 Texas Law Review 1 (1984) K Elzinga and D Mills "Trumping the Areeda-Turner Test: The Recoupment Standard in Brooke Group" 62 Antitrust Law Journal 559 (1994) P Geroski and J Schwalbach (eds) Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison (1991) P Geroski, R J Gilbert & A Jacquemin Barriers to Entry and Strategic Competition (1990) D Harbord and T Hoehn "Barriers to Entry and Exit in European Competition Policy" 14 International Review of Law and Economics 411 (1994). G A Hay "The Economics of Predatory Pricing" 51 Antitrust Law Journal 361 (1982) G Hay, J C Hilke and P B Nelson "Geographic Market Definition in an International G Hay "Market Power in Antitrust" 60 Antitrust Law Journal 807 (1992) Context"64 Chicago-Kent Law Review 711 (1988) G Hay "Predatory Pricing" 58 Antitrust Law Journal 913 (1990) R Hubbard "Potential Production: A Supply Side Approach for Relevant Product Market Definitions"48 Fordham Law Review 1199 (1980) T Krattenmaker, R Lande and S Salop "Monopoly Power and Market Power in Antitrust Law" 76 Georgetown Law Journal 241 (1987) W M Landes & R A Posner "Market Power in Antitrust Cases" 94 Harvard Law Review 937 (1981) W J Leibler "Whither Predatory Pricing? From Areeda and Turner to Matsushita" 61 Notre Dame Law Review 1052 (1986) R Pitofsky "New Definitions of Relevant Marketand the Assault on Antitrust" 90 Columbia Law Review 1805 (1990) R A Posner Antitrust Law – An Economic Perspective (1976) R A Posner "The Chicago School of Antitrust Analysis" 127 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 925 (1979) S Salop, "Strategic Entry Deterrence" 69 American Economic Review 335 (1979). F M Scherer & D Ross Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance (3rd ed 1990) ch 2 F M Scherer "Predatory Pricing and the Sherman Act: A Comment" 89 Harvard Law Review 869 (1976) G Stigler "Henry Calvert Simons" 17 Journal of Law and Economics 1 (1974) G J Stigler The Organisation of Industry (1968) L Sullivan Antitrust (1977) A van Witteloostuijn Barriers to Entry and Dynamic Economies – A Survey and Critique (1986) C C von Weizsäcker "A Welfare Analysis of Barriers to Entry" 11 Bell Journal of Economics 399 (1980) D L White "Shaping Antitrust Enforcement: Greater Emphasis on Barriers to Entry" Brigham Young Law Review 823 (1989) O E Williamson "Predatory Pricing: A Strategic and Welfare Analysis" 87 Yale Law Journal 284 (1977))
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate