Prashar v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 57

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Prashar v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 57

IMMIGRATION – application for review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal – well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of religion under the Convention is not limited to people holding a religious belief but extends also to those persecuted because they do not hold a religious belief. Shahzad Gul Awan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 435, doubted

POOJA PRASHAR & ORS v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N1165 of 2000

MADGWICK J 7 FEBRUARY 2001 SYDNEY

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1165 of 2000

BETWEEN: POOJA PRASHAR, VIKAS PRASHAR & KARAN PRASHAR

APPLICANTS

AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

JUDGE: MADGWICK J

DATE OF ORDER: 7 FEBRUARY 2001

WHERE MADE: SYDNEY

THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. The application be dismissed. 2. The applicants pay the respondent's costs.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N1165 of 2000

BETWEEN: POOJA PRASHAR, VIKAS PRASHAR & KARAN PRASHAR

APPLICANTS

AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

RESPONDENT

JUDGE: MADGWICK J

DATE: 7 FEBRUARY 2001

PLACE: SYDNEY

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT (revised from transcript) HIS HONOUR: 1 This is an application for the limited form of judicial review available under s 476 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ("the Act") in respect of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal ("the Tribunal"). By that decision the Tribunal affirmed a decision of a delegate of the respondent Minister not to grant protection visas to the applicants who are husband, wife and an infant child. No separate case was mounted before the Tribunal or before me based on the circumstances of the applicant who is the infant child. It is convenient therefore, to refer to the husband and wife as the applicants or, as the case may be, as the husband or the wife. 2 The case ultimately depends upon whether the applicants, or any of them, fall within Article 1A(2) of the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees 1951 as amended by the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees ("the Convention") which provides that a person is a refugee if: "owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country; or who, not having a nationality and being outside the country of his former habitual residence, is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to it."