Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Bailey v Beagle Management Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 60
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for leave to appeal against refusal to set aside notices to produce issued in connection with security for costs applications – documents sought accepted to be relevant – whether notices fishing – whether general rule that party issuing notice must first have evidence supporting substantive claim – nature of fishing objection – whether substantial injustice if order wrong and uncorrected WORDS AND PHRASES – "fishing" COSTS – unsuccessful application for leave to appeal against interlocutory order in a matter of practice and procedure – whether costs should be ordered to be paid forthwith pursuant to O 62 r 3(2) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 24(1A) Federal Court Rules O 33 r 12, O 62 r 3(2)
Commissioner for Railways v Small (1938) 38 SR (NSW) 564 at 575 followed Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 followed Jarrett v Seymour (1993) 46 FCR 557 followed Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc (1981) 148 CLR 170 at 177 followed Home Office v Harman [1983]1AC 280 mentioned Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Plowman (1995) 183 CLR 10 at 33 mentioned Associated Dominions Assurance Society Pty Ltd v John Fairfax & Son Pty Ltd (1952) 72 WN(NSW) 250 at 254 followed Caltex Refining Co Pty Ltd v AMWU (unreported, Full Court, 6 December 1990) followed Trade Practices Commission v CC (New South Wales) Pty Ltd (1995) 58 FCR 426 at 436 followed Treasurer v CanWest Global Communications Corp [1997] FCA 578 followed Microsoft Corporation v Adelong Electronics Pty Ltd [1997] FCA 224 followed Bertran v Vanstone [1999] FCA 1753 at pars 18-23 followed In the matter of Davison, Donnelly v Davison [2000] FCA 1396 followed Grant v Downs (1976) 135 CLR 674 at 685 followed WA Pines Pty Ltd v Bannerman (1980) 41 FLR 175 at 181 mentioned PETER G BAILEY & ORS V BEAGLE MANAGEMENT PTY LTD & ORS V 435 OF 2000 HEEREY, BRANSON AND MERKEL JJ 12 FEBRUARY 2001 MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate