Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union v G & K O'Connor Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 72
INDUSTRIAL LAW - notice of motion filed by respondent seeking an order that the interlocutory orders of the Court made on 12 December 2000 compelling respondent to comply with the G & K O'Connor and Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union Victorian Meat Processing Agreement 1992 by paying personal applicants according to provisions of that Agreement be discharged - whether undertaking of respondent to not offer AWAs to personal applicants obviates need for interlocutory orders - whether the "varying hardship" being experienced by personal applicants justifies discharging of interlocutory orders - notice of motion filed by applicants seeking variation of interlocutory orders of the Court made on 12 December 2000 - whether the interlocutory orders should be varied so that precise rates of pay are set for the personal applicants Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) s170WG(1) Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union v G & K O'Connor Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1795 referred to
Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union v G & K O'Connor Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1948 referred to
Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union v G & K O'Connor Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 176 referred to
AUSTRALASIAN MEAT INDUSTRY EMPLOYEES' UNION, COLLIN ROSS AND ORS v G & K O'CONNOR PTY LTD V833 OF 2000 MARSHALL J MELBOURNE 12 FEBRUARY 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 833 OF 2000
BETWEEN: AUSTRALASIAN MEAT INDUSTRY EMPLOYEES' UNION
FIRST APPLICANT
COLLIN ROSS
SECOND APPLICANT
AND OTHERS (According to Schedule annexed hereto)
THIRD TO THIRTY-FIRST APPLICANTS
AND: G & K O'CONNOR PTY LTD
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MARSHALL J
DATE: 12 FEBRUARY 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate