Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Oates v Attorney-General for the Commonwealth of Australia [2001] FCA 84
EXTRADITION – request by Australia for surrender of a person in Poland to answer criminal charges in Australia – relief sought under s 39B of Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) in respect of request - whether making of request an exercise of executive power of Commonwealth of a statutory power conferred by s 40 of Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) – whether request required to "conform" to Poland (Extradition: Commonwealth of Australia and New Zealand) Treaty – whether Treaty contained any stipulations with which request for surrender could comply – effect of legal elements of the Australian offences charged lying outside scope of the crimes and offences enumerated in the Treaty understood in accordance with Australian law - effect of delay in making present application Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) subs 11(3), s 40 Poland (Extradition: Commonwealth of Australia and New Zealand) Treaty Barton v Commonwealth of Australia (1974) 131 CLR 477, applied Johnson v Williams (Attorney-General) [2000] FCA 3 (FC), distinguished Levinge v Director of Custodial Services (1987) 9 NSWLR 546 (CA), distinguished Bollag v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth (1997) 79 FCR 198, referred to R v Horseferry Road Magistrates' Court; Ex parte Bennett [1994] 1 AC 42 (HL), distinguished Bou-Simon v Attorney General [2000] FCA 24 (FC), applied Zoeller v Federal Republic of Germany (1989) 23 FCR 282 (FC), discussed Leung v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 79 FCR 400 (FC), distinguished Russell v United States 789 F2d. 801 (9th Cir. 1986), referred to Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273, referred to Winkler v Director of Public Prosecutions (1990) 25 FCR 79 (FC), referred to Brown v West (1990) 169 CLR 195, referred to R v Bevan; Ex parte Elias and Gordon (1942) 66 CLR 452, referred to Newcrest Mining (WA) Ltd v The Commonwealth of Australia (1997) 190 CLR 513, referred to Bennett v Government of the United Kingdom [2000] FCA 916, cited In re Bellencontre [1891] 2 QB 122, cited Re Arton (No 2) [1896] 1 QB 509, cited R v Dix (1902) 18 TLR 231, cited R v Governor of Pentonville Prison; Ex parte Ecke [1974] Crim LR 102, cited R v Governor of Pentonville Prison; Ex parte Budlong [1980] 1 WLR 1110, cited Riley v The Commonwealth (1985) 159 CLR 1, cited James Buchanan & Co Ltd v Babco Forwarding and Shipping (UK) Ltd [1978] AC 141, cited Government of Belgium v Postlethwaite [1988] AC 924, cited Great China Metal Industries Co Ltd v Malaysian International Shipping Corporation Berhad (1998) 196 CLR 161, cited Curragh Queensland Mining Ltd v Daniel (1992) 34 FCR 212 (FC), referred to Clyne v Evans (1984) 2 FCR 515, cited ANTONY GORDON OATES v ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA & ANOR N 1329 OF 2000 LINDGREN J 16 FEBRUARY 2001 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate