Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 94
Federal Court of Australia
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs
[2001] FCA 94
OLGA DRANICHNIKOV v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS AND MS RYNEETE GAULT in her capacity as an officer of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs AND MR KEVIN DUFFY in his capacity as an officer of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
Q 89 of 2000
DOWSETT J
29 JANUARY 2001
BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 89 OF 2000
BETWEEN: OLGA DRANICHNIKOV
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENT
MS RYNEETE GAULT in her capacity as an officer of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
SECOND RESPONDENT
MR KEVIN DUFFY in his capacity as an officer of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
THIRD RESPONDENT
JUDGE: DOWSETT J
DATE OF ORDER: 29 JANUARY 2001
WHERE MADE: BRISBANE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The applicant pay the respondent's costs of the proceedings.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY Q 89 OF 2000
BETWEEN: OLGA DRANICHNIKOV
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
MS RYNEETE GAULT in her capacity as an officer of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
SECOND RESPONDENT
MR KEVIN DUFFY in his capacity as an officer of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs
THIRD RESPONDENT
JUDGE: DOWSETT J
DATE: 29 JANUARY 2001
PLACE: BRISBANE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1 There is no reason why costs should not follow the event. I order that the applicant pay the respondent's costs of the proceedings. As to the impecuniosity of the applicant, that is a matter which may or may not be treated as relevant by the Minister in determining whether or not to enforce the order.
I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Dowsett.
Associate:
Dated: 15 February 2001
The Applicant appeared in person.
Solicitor for the Respondent: Mr J Bishop, Australian Government Solicitor
Date of Hearing: 29 January 2001
Date of Judgment: 29 January 2001