Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cabal v United Mexican States [2001] FCA 97
EXTRADITION – application for leave to appeal from refusal of bail pending determination of appeal to Full Court against dismissal by single judge of application to review magistrate's order – successive unsuccessful applications – "special circumstances" – whether changed circumstances necessary – whether comments of judges and others can be "special circumstances" – risk of absconding Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) ss 21(6)(f)(iv), 53 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)s 24(1A) Cabal v United Mexican States [2000] FCA 7 - considered Schoenmakers v Director of Public Prosecutions (1991) 30 FCR 70 - mentioned Wu v Attorney-General (Cth) (1997) 79 FCR 303 - mentioned Bertran v Minister for Justice (1999) 165 ALR 155 - mentioned von Arnim v Federal Republic of Germany [1994] FCA 1747 - mentioned Holt v Hogan (No 1) (1993) 44 FCR 572 - mentioned Cabal v McDonnell [1999] VSC 221 - mentioned Cabal v United Mexican States (No 2) [2000] FCA 295 – considered Cabal v United Mexican States (No 5) [2000] FCA 525 - considered Cabal v United Mexican States (No 3) [2000] FCA 1204 - mentioned Cabal v Secretary v Department of Justice (Victoria) [2000] FCA 949 - considered Cabal v Secretary, Department of Justice (Victoria) [2000] FCA 1227 - considered CARLOS CABAL PENICHE v UNITED MEXICAN STATES NO V 1 OF 2001 HEEREY, MARSHALL and MERKEL JJ 21 FEBRUARY 2001 MELBOURNE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY V 1 OF 2001
BETWEEN: CARLOS CABAL PENICHE
APPLICANT
AND: UNITED MEXICAN STATES
FIRST RESPONDENT
LISA HANNAN M
SECOND RESPONDENT JUDGE: HEEREY, MARSHALL AND MERKEL JJ
DATE OF ORDER: 21 FEBRUARY 2001
WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate