Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Miller v Chapman [2001] FCA 105 TAXATION - application challenged taxation assessments on grounds foredoomed to failure - applicant did not press claims at hearing and application dismissed - claims pursued upon advice and at direction of third party - third party joined as party to proceedings to seek costs against it - whether costs should be awarded against party joined - whether costs should be on indemnity basis. CIVIL PROCEDURE - joinder of a party to proceedings with a view to seeking an order for costs against that party on an indemnity basis - presentation and maintenance of claims which had no prospect of success - whether that conduct amounted to an abuse of process - claims presented and maintained upon advice and under direction of party joined - party joined played active part in conduct of proceedings - party joined knew or had good reason to know claims had no prospect of success - whether appropriate to order party joined to pay costs - whether appropriate to order costs payable on indemnity basis. Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 208 and s 209 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) ss 4, 6D, 7, 8 and 8A Federal Court Rules O 22 r 2(1)(d) Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Levick (1999) 168 ALR 383 applied Levick v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2000] FCA 674 applied, followed Knight v F P Special Assets Ltd (1992) 174 CLR 178 considered Walton v Gardiner (1992-1993) 177 CLR 378 applied Dooney v Henry 174 ALR 41 applied, followed Poonon Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [1999] NSW SC 1121 applied McKewins Hairdressing and Beauty Supplies Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2000) 171 ALR 335 followed Money Tree Management Services Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 1) [2000] SASC 54 referred to Money Tree Management Services Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (No 2) [2000] SASC 63 applied Helljay Investments Pty Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 166 ALR 302 referred to Joosse v Australian Securities and Investment Commission (1998) 159 ALR 260 referred to Professional Nominees Pty Ltd v Walsh [1998] Qld CA 5591 referred to
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate