Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Giraldo v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 113 IMMIGRATION – refugees – Refugee Review Tribunal – finding that applicant not at risk of persecution by reason of political opinion – whether failure to set out findings on material facts – whether evidence to support findings – unrepresented applicant failed to raise claim to fear persecution by reason of membership of particular social group – whether Tribunal erred in failing to consider persecution for that reason – whether extended family can constitute a "particular social group" – whether findings of fact made any error immaterial.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 430(1)(c), 476(1)(a), 476(1)(e), 476(1)(g), 476(4)(b).
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259, cited. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Singh (2000) 98 FCR 469, applied. Chan Yee Kin v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379, cited. Chen Shi Hai v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 170 ALR 553, cited. Gersten v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 855, cited. Pat Toi Choi v Minister for Immigrationa and Multicultural Affairs (unreported, Lindgren J, 2 December 1998), cited. Curragh Queensland Mining Ltd v Daniel (1992) 34 FCR 212, cited. Sarrazola v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 101, considered. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Sarrazola (1999) 95 FCR 517, followed. Applicant 'A' v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1997) 190 CLR 225, cited. Minister for Immigrigation and Multicultural Affairs v Zamora (1998) 85 FCR 458, cited. Guo Wei Zhi v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (unreported, Full Court, 10 December 1998), cited. Martinez v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1997] Imm AR 227, not followed. C v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1999) 94 FCR 366, considered. Sarrazola v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (No 3) [2000] FCA 919, cited. Saliba v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1998) 89 FCR 38, followed. Paramananthan v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 94 FCR 28, cited. Meadows v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1998) 90 FCR 370, cited. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321, followed. EVERT HAIDEN GIRALDO v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 876 of 2000 SACKVILLE J SYDNEY 23 FEBRUARY 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate