Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Stoelwinder v Southern Health
[2001] FCA 115
CONTRACTS – construction – whether actual intention of parties relevant – whether permissible to have regard to variation EQUITY – fiduciary duties – negotiations for contract of employment – duty of employee to make disclosure to employer EMPLOYMENT LAW – employee entitlements and remuneration – entitlement to 'cash in' sick leave Aberdeen Railway Co v Blaikie Bros (1854) 1 Macq HL 461 cited American Casualty Co v Baker, 22 F 3d 880, 887, (9th Cir 1994) cited Attorney-General for Hong Kong v Reid [1994] 1 AC 324 cited Auto Specialties Manufacturing Co, In Re; Boyd v Sachs 153 B.R. 503, (W D Mich 1993) referred to Baker v Hellner Realty Co 265 Mich 625, 631 (1933) cited Baladevon, Inc v Abbott Laboratories, Inc, 871 F Supp 89 (D Mass 1994) cited Berke Moore Co, Inc v Phoenix Bridge Co, 98 NH 261, 269, 98 A 2d 150, 156 (1953) referred to Boulting v Association of Cinematograph, Television and Allied Technicians [1963] 2 QB 606 applied BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 applied Breen v Williams (1996) 186 CLR 71 referred to Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1982) 149 CLR 337 referred to Concut Pty Ltd v Worrell [2000] HCA 64 cited Coomber, In Re [1911] 1 Ch 723 cited Dunn v English (1874) 18 LR Eq 524 cited Eustis Mining Co v Beer, Sondheimer & Co Inc, 239 F 976, 984-985 (S D NY 1917) cited Fill Buildings Inc v Alexander Hamilton Life Insurance Co 396 Mich 453, 460-461 (1976) cited Henderson, Hallam-Eames & Hughes v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1995] 2 AC 145 cited Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corporation (1984) 156 CLR 41 applied Inland Revenue Commissioners v Raphael [1935] AC 96 cited Lister v Stubbs (1890) 45 Ch D 1 cited Liverpool City Council v Irwin [1977] AC 239 applied Maguire & Tansey v Makaronis (1997) 188 CLR 449 referred to McKenzie v McDonald [1927] VLR 134 cited Nottingham University v Fishel [2000] IRLR 471 cited Pepper v Litton 308 US 295 (1939) referred to Petrotta v Gerson, 98 Cal App 507, 277 P 167 (1929) applied President of India v Jebsens (UK) Ltd [1991] 1 Lloyd's Rep 1 cited Reading v Attorney-General [1951] AC 507 cited Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Hansen-Tangen [1976] 1 WLR 989 referred to Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134 cited S A Maritime et Commerciale of Geneva v Anglo-Iranian Oil Co Ltd [1954] 1 WLR 492 applied Sunbury Textile Mills, Inc v Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 585 F 2d 1190, 1196 (3rd Cir 1978) cited Taylor v Johnson (1983) 151 CLR 422 referred to Tradax Export SA v Volkswagenwerk AG [1970] 1 QB 537 applied 3 Corbin on Contracts, § 538 (2nd ed, 1960) Restatement (Second) of Contracts, § 201(1) 17A Am Jur 2d, Contracts (1991) § 388 JOHANNES UILTJE STOELWINDER v SOUTHERN HEALTH V 263 of 1999 FINKELSTEIN J MELBOURNE 23 FEBRUARY 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate