Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Rural Press Limited [2001] FCA 116 TRADE PRACTICES - alleged contraventions of ss 45(a) and (b) and 46 of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) against two publishers of regional newspapers in South Australia and parent company of one publisher - one publisher broadened its regional newspaper circulation into part of the prime circulation area of other publisher but subsequently withdrew that extended circulation - communications between officers of respondent companies - whether the circumstances surrounding the withdrawal constituted an arrangement or understanding containing an exclusionary provision in contravention of s 45(2)(a) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) - consideration of what constitutes an "arrangement" or "understanding" - meaning of "exclusionary provision" in s 4D - whether purpose subjective or objective. TRADE PRACTICES - the market - consideration of what should be the relevant market for the purposes of s 45(2) - whether broad identification of market should be made - applicant contended that the market should be limited to the provision of services by the publication of newspapers in the relevant area - respondents contend it should extend to include competition with radio and newspapers in other regional areas - 'substitutability' in s 4E - whether arrangement had purpose or effect of substantially lessening competition in market where competition existed in small part of market only and subsequently was withdrawn. TRADE PRACTICES - market power - whether contravention of s 46(1) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) - first respondent alleged to have taken advantage of a substantial degree of market power in the identified market - consideration of relevant factors in determining whether substantial degree of market power - relevance of general financial resources and strength of first respondent. TRADE PRACTICES - involvement of the directors in the contraventions - whether they were knowingly concerned in or parties to the alleged contraventions within the meaning of s 75B.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate