Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Win v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 132 IMMIGRATION – application for review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal ("the Tribunal") – applicants claimed to be involved in clandestine anti-government activities – Tribunal found that authorities unaware of clandestine activities and therefore applicants would not be punished on return – Tribunal failed to consider whether restrictions on free expression of political opinion may amount to persecution in itself – persecution not merely punishment – persecution may take form of denial of civil rights if it would offend a real aspiration so held as to be integral to the human dignity of an asylum seeker.
WORDS & PHRASES – "persecution"
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 476(1)(e) Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees 1951 as amended by the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees
Chan v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379, applied "Applicant LSLS" v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 211, applied Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Zheng [2000] FCA 50, applied Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v Ibrahim (2000) 175 ALR 585, applied Sellamuthu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs (1999) 90 FCR 287, applied Reg v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, Ex parte Shah [1999] 2 WLR 1015, cited U WIN AND ANOR v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 228 OF 2000
MADGWICK J SYDNEY 23 FEBRUARY 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 228 OF 2000
BETWEEN: U WIN
FIRST APPLICANT
MA WIN WIN
SECOND APPLICANT
AND: MINSTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: MADGWICK J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate