Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SARKER v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS [2001] FCA 190
IMMIGRATION – Application for protection visa – review of decision of Refugee Review Tribunal refusing visa – Applicant well educated and family in Bangladesh living in favourable circumstance there - Applicant claimed to face persecution from Awami League if returned to Bangladesh by reason of active membership in Freedom Party – RRT found Applicant not a credible witness in relation to material claims and otherwise failed to establish genuine fear of persecution if returned to Bangladesh – RRT found documents allegedly produced by Applicant from Bangladesh sources not authentic or credible – RRT found evidence of Bangladesh nationals corroborating Applicant unsatisfactory – contemporary country information concerning political events and conditions in Bangladesh inconsistent with evidence of Applicant and such supporting witnesses - Court unable to interfere with findings of fact of RRT – no error of law demonstrated.
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 359, 476(1)(e), 476(1)(g), 476(4)(b) Rahman v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1277 referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Ibrahim (2000) 175 ALR 585 applied Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajalingam (1999) 93 FCR 220 applied Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Thiyagarajah [2000] 169 ALR 515 applied Vichlenkova v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1338 applied Curragh Queensland Mining Ltd v Daniel (1992) 34 FCR 212 referred to Fernando v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 962 referred to MANIRUL ISLAM SARKER v MINISTER OF IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
CONTI J 7 MARCH 2001 SYDNEY
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate