Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Thepsiri v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 204 IMMIGRATION – application seeking review of the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal – where no particulars provided and no submissions made in relation to the application – whether the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal was authorised under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36(2), 65, 415, 476 Federal Court Rules O 32 r 2(1)(d) KITTIYA THEPSIRI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS N 46 of 2001 STONE J SYDNEY 7 MARCH 2001
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 46 OF 2001
BETWEEN: KITTIYA THEPSIRI
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: STONE J
DATE OF ORDER: 7 MARCH 2001
WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT: 1. the application be dismissed; 2. the applicant pay the respondent's costs.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY N 46 OF 2001
BETWEEN: KITTIYA THEPSIRI
APPLICANT
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
RESPONDENT
JUDGE: STONE J
DATE: 7 MARCH 2001
PLACE: SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 On 18 September 2000, the applicant, Ms Thepsiri, a citizen of Thailand, applied to the respondent ("the Minister") for a protection visa to remain in Australia. Her application was refused by the Minister's delegate ("Delegate") on 29 September 2000. This refusal was upheld by the Refugee Review Tribunal ("Tribunal") on 1 December 2000. The applicant now applies under s 476(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ("the Act") for review of the Tribunal's decision. 2 The applicant did not appear at the hearing today. She has been called outside the court to no avail. In the circumstances, I have decided to proceed with the trial in accordance with Order 32 rule 2(1)(d) of the Federal Court Rules.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate